Search for: "Hughes et al v. Does et al" Results 41 - 60 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2014, 10:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Along with many others, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Justin Hughes, Peter Menell, and David Nimmer submitted an amicus in Garcia v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:14 am by Docket Navigator
Hughes Communications, Inc. et al, 2-13-cv-07245 (CACD November 3, 2014, Order) (Pfaelzer, J.) [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 5:37 am by David Cheifetz
Connaught Laboratories et al. (1980), 14 C.C.L.T. 251, there is to be found, in more or less precatory language, an eloquent expression of concern about the requirement of our law that fault exist as a condition precedent to the receipt of compensation in matters of this kind. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, [1978] 1 SCR 369 at 394 [National Energy Board]. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am by Ron Coleman
This motion does not address the questionable merits of [Pearson's] claims. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am by Ron Coleman
This motion does not address the questionable merits of [Pearson's] claims. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
Didham, et al., “Suicide and Self-Harm Following Prescription of SSRIs and Other Antidepressants: Confounding By Indication,” 60 Br. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
” Extradition to the US – the Abu Hamza judgment As set out in a post by Isabel McArdle, further to a decision by the Strasbourg Court (which is not final yet – Hamza et al have 3 months in which to seek an appeal in the Court’s Grand Chamber), Abu Hamza and Babar Ahmad may now be extradited to the US. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
  Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:05 pm by pgbarnes
Houston Funding II, Ltd, et al,  (Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-02442) that “lactation is not pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition. [read post]