Search for: "INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS"
Results 41 - 60
of 506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2014, 1:52 pm
In general, 10 of the key decision making factors for plaintiff firms in bringing class cases under the Competition Act are as follows: 1. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
The problem with these settlements was not that the plaintiffs lacked the leverage to cut a good deal; indeed, the indirect purchasers in Sullivan and the investors in In re AIG did just fine. [read post]
16 May 2018, 9:00 am
The plaintiffs allege that Talisman shorted them on royalty payments for oil leases on their land. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 2:41 pm
The class that plaintiffs sought to certify contained consumers from all fifty states. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:11 pm
” 2014 WL 123099, at *2 (citing In re Ductile Iron Pipe Fittings (DIPF) Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litig., 2013 WL 5503308, at *11-12 (D.N.J. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
From a plaintiff's perspective do you have favorite courts to file antitrust class actions. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:35 pm
One American academic has analysed all of the US indirect purchaser class certification decisions. [read post]
27 May 2021, 2:54 pm
Do the plaintiffs have a case? [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:25 am
Moreover, plaintiffs failed to allege that any of the exceptions to the Illinois Brick doctrine applied. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:51 am
In granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, the court focused on definitional inconsistencies in the complaints of the plaintiffs, who include a putative class of direct purchasers and indirect purchasers of ODDs and ODD Products. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:23 am
It was improper to include in an indirect purchaser class plaintiffs whose claims arose in states that foreclosed indirect purchasers from recovering for price fixing or monopolization. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 11:30 am
The court concluded that plaintiffs’ direct and indirect evidence of class-wide significant exposure fell short of establishing common proof for each and every class member’s exposure to C-8. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:56 am
"A plaintiff’s status as an assignee did not prevent it from representing the direct-purchaser damages class. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:43 pm
Simon opined that "gone" are the days when a plaintiff's attorney could simply file a boilerplate class certification motion and get the class quickly certified. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:10 am
Jan. 3, 2012), the plaintiffs sought certification of a class of indirect purchasers of ready-mix concrete who were injured by an alleged price-fixing conspiracy in the Florida concrete industry. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:57 am
The motion was granted because:First, the summary judgment record contained no direct or indirect evidence that Defendant had a discriminatory attitude in dealing with the Plaintiff;Second, Plaintiff did not establish on the summary judgment record that her job performance was satisfactory (the second element of a prima facie case under the McDonnell Douglas protocol); andThird, Plaintiff did not establish that there were any employees who were not members of the… [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:24 am
Tenet HealthSystem Phila., Inc., the Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a class action waiver in the context of an FLSA claim, where the plaintiff argued that the waiver violated Pennsylvania law, but, again, the plaintiff did not make a Section 7 argument. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:44 pm
”[10] There is no doubt that class action treatment has lucrative benefits for both defense and plaintiffs counsel — “half of the nearly $23 billion in securities claims costs in the last five years has gone to plaintiff and defense lawyers. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 10:07 pm
The panel held that the fee award so dwarfed the (indirect) relief for the class that it called for closer study by the district court. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 4:22 am
Antitrust Class Action Complaint Failed to Adequately Establish Antitrust Injury thus Warranting Dismissal of Certain Antitrust Claims in Class Action Complaint for Lack of Standing California Federal Holds Plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit against various defendants for allegedly conspiring to artificially inflate and fix the prices of dynamic random access memory (DRAM) in the market: plaintiffs are indirect purchasers of DRAM, and… [read post]
