Search for: "Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. " Results 41 - 60 of 221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The statute provides that the court may award attorneys’ fees to the prevailing party “in exceptional cases” (see Octane Fitness, LLC v Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., __ US __, __, 134 S Ct 1749, 1756 [2014]). [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Patent No. 6,701,271 (owned by Icon Health & Fitness) are directed to patent-ineligible subject matter and are, therefore, invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
And in its decision handed down today in Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.,[1] relaxed the applicable standard in construing the Patent Act’s identical fee-shifting provision and will likely result in a lower bar to the recovery of fees in trademark disputes. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.,[1] relaxed the applicable standard in construing the Patent Act’s identical fee-shifting provision and will likely result in a lower bar to the recovery of fees in trademark disputes. [read post]