Search for: "Jack Roe"
Results 41 - 60
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2007, 6:27 am
Carhart (following on the heels of Monday's class on Roe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Jack M. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
Jack Goldsmith on Watergate (Harvard Law Today). [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:00 am
Beyond Belief, Beyond Conscience: The Radical Significance of the Free Exercise of Religion, by Jack N. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
There is a special kind of felicity in being able to combine these paths, doing well while also doing good, especially the kind of good that embodies some kind of conviction personal to the lawyer. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:37 am
Jack M. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:27 am
Your question was a good one and Jack did not answer it. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 4:02 am
I objected that this has been the effect of some wobbly Supreme Court Justices, but that in fact during this period, the Party has sought to overturn Roe, even though I agreed with Jack's underlying premise that overruling Roe might well be bad for the Republican Party as an institution, because that would de-energize religious conservatives and energize liberals on the issue. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
This is a dramatic win for the pro-life movement, a foothold for reversing Roe? [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:20 pm
I think Jack Balkin's response to Levinson hints at why it is wrong but doesn't go the full distance: [T]his fails to account for how Roe would be overruled in practice. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 8:00 am
Board of Education Should Have Said (2001) and What Roe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:37 am
Phil Roe (R-Tenn.) characterized as restricting access to financial advice and expanding the definition of “fiduciary” under ERISA. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 8:12 am
One that comes immediately to mind (since I'm writing for Balkinization) is the book project Jack Balkin hosted a few years back, What Roe v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:08 pm
He was the Wade in Roe v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
[Thank you to Jack for inviting me to contribute to Balkinization. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:58 pm
In a landmark joint opinion, authored by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Sandra Day O’Connor, and David Souter, a narrow five-Justice majority reaffirmed what they called the “essential holding of Roe,” beating back a twenty-year assault on the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 4:15 pm
As Sam Luks and Michael Salamone detail in our book, aggregate opinion on abortion has moved up and down a little since Roe, but not in any consistent trajectory. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
Among those in the mainstream, a major concern is whether the Court will overturn Roe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 1:57 pm
Jack and Ben have already flagged their entries in a Hoover Institution Task Force on National Security and Law series on national security challenges for the second Obama term (Hoover is adding one essay per day, all very short opinion piece of 1200 words of so). [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 6:24 am
Presumably arguments about, in Jack Balkin’s formulation, What Roe v. [read post]
