Search for: "John Does 11-20" Results 41 - 60 of 2,095
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
Our Tuesday, February 20, 2024 responsive post pointed out that Section 789 says nothing at all about the President. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 8:27 am
The virtual consciousness does not ask permission to think, though it may be unable to actualize its determinations. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
When two people share a home and they disagree on whether to consent to a search, does the Fourth Amendment allow the police to search? [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
How does this compare with SEC rulemaking under prior administrations? [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:13 am by Berry Law
What does this mean and how do you know if you qualify? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Eliav Lieblich
Second, the United States is not party to API, and the DoD Manual does not explicitly embrace the Fundamental Guarantees regime as binding. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:23 am by Mark Ashton
A 20 year old John Deere tractor is securing bids on Ebay exceeding $10,000 as we write this. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Complaint in Superior Court of California (March 20, 2018) Common Cause FEC Complaint re: Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
John v MGN Ltd (1995): Enclosing the Jury Paddock? [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:32 am by Beatrice Yahia
RESPONSE National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby repeated objections yesterday to Israel’s moves to create a buffer zone, saying, “We do not want to see the territory of Gaza reduced in any way. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:08 am
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: Precedential No. 34: TTAB Dismisses Monster Energy's Section 2(d) Claim On Summary Judgment Due to DIssimilarity of Design Marks Precedential No. 29: After an Exhausting 2(d) Analysis, TTAB Finds HME (Stylized) Confusable with KME for Building Products Precedential No. 27: TTAB Renders Split Decision in Appeal From Section 2(d) Refusal of IMPACT for Various Healthcare Services Precedential No. 12: TTAB Hands Win to MLBPA and Aaron Judge In… [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period July through December 2023. [read post]