Search for: "Jonathan Feldman"
Results 41 - 60
of 189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2019, 3:53 am
The Committee heard testimony from Noah Feldman, Pamela Karlan, Jonathan Turley, and the National Constitution Center’s very own Scholar-in-Residence, Michael Gerhardt. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 9:56 am
The republicans invited Professor Jonathan Turley to testify. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 6:46 am
The fourth witness, Jonathan Turley of George Washington University Law School, argued that there is not enough evidence to move forward. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:55 am
But then there was Jonathan Turley. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:34 pm
See also C-SPAN video of the testimony Witnesses – Professor Noah Feldman – Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law and Director, Julis-Rabinowitz Program on Jewish and Israeli Law, Harvard Law School Feldman Testimony – Feldman Bio Professor Michael Gerhardt – Burton Craige Distinguished Professor of Jurisprudence, The University of North Carolina School of Law Gerhardt Testimony – Gerhardt Bio Professor Pamela S. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:09 am
The first 2 witnesses — Noah Feldman and Pam Karlan — scolded and yelled. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:46 am
Karlan of Stanford Law School and Professor Jonathan Turley of George Washington University Law School. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:46 pm
In his impeachment preview, Scott notes that on Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee will begin its hearings by taking testimony from four law professors: Pam Karlan, Noah Feldman, Michael Gerhardt, and Jonathan Turley. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:31 am
Key Findings Currently, the home mortgage interest deduction (HMID) allows itemizing homeowners to deduct mortgage interest paid on up to $750,000 worth of principal, on either their first or second residence. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am
Johnson ProfMEJohnson1 Baltimore Clinical Teaching Robert Knowles ProfKnowles Baltimore Civil Procedure National Security Law Colin Starger ColinStarger Baltimore Nadia Ahmad nadiabahmad Barry Property Environmental Law Corporate Law Loren Mulraine LorenMulraine Belmont Entertainment Law Media Law Intellectual property Jeffrey Usman Prawfish Belmont Máiréad Enright marieadenright Birmingham (UK) Law & Religion… [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:41 pm
Early commentary comes from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg; Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog; Jay Michaelson at the Daily Beast; David French at National Review; Quin Hillyer in an op-ed for the Washington Examiner; Jonathan Adler at The Volokh Conspiracy; Lisa Soronen at the Council of State Governments’ blog; and Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:31 am
Others who have looked at the data, such as Adam Feldman of Empirical SCOTUS, reach the same results. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:44 pm
The SEC previously dismissed fraud charges against Jonathan Feldman in 2016 after determining there was insufficient evidence that his trading scheme was illegal. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 2:30 pm
Adam Feldman evaluates the evidence thus far. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:55 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Jonathan Metzl weighs in on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:56 pm
” Jonathan Stempel of Reuters reports that “Palestinians’ lawsuit in U.S. vs. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:33 pm
” And online at The New Republic, Jonathan Zimmerman has an essay titled “Who Is John Roberts Kidding? [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am
The November 2018 issue of the American Bar Association Journal (ABAJ) featured an exposé-style article on the hazards of our chemical environment, worthy of Mother Jones, or the International Journal of Health Nostrums, by a lawyer, Alan Bell.1Alan Bell, according to his website, is a self-described “environmental health warrior. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
* Adam Feldman identifies eight issues where widely divergent state laws could lead to Supreme Court intervention. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 4:29 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman surveys “eight issues with laws that significantly vary at that state level and which affect large swaths of the population” that he suggests “are potential sparks for litigation in hot-button areas that might very well reach the Supreme Court. [read post]
