Search for: "Jonathan Shaub"
Results 41 - 60
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2021, 9:17 am
Jonathan Shaub examined whether a former president can invoke executive privilege in an impeachment trial. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:26 am
” Jonathan Shaub discussed the challenges of prosecuting Steve Bannon and how the committee could eliminate any potential claim of executive privilege to facilitate their investigation. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am
Jonathan Shaub walked readers through that assertion. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 12:38 pm
Rohini Kurup and Jonathan Shaub discussed a recent filing from the Justice Department which they argue offers clues about why Peter Navarro faces prosecution for contempt of Congress while Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino do not. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am
.; whether the State Department should designate drug cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations; and recent appellate court rulings regarding the Fifth Amendment and national security issues: Jonathan Shaub also analyzed the Muthana case, along with the case of Shamima Begum, a young woman who left the U.K. to join the Islamic State, and the citizenship issues at stake. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
” Jonathan Shaub considered the legal basis for the withholding of testimony by some in the impeachment trial. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:20 pm
Jonathan Shaub provided an update on his earlier article, which explored ways to facilitate Bannon’s prosecution, in light of recent updates.= Stewart Baker shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast, featuring: Dmitri Alperovitch discussing the ransomware summit; a proposal for regulating Silicon Valley and LinkedIn’s China operations; Tatyana Bolton laying out regulations of algorithms and WhatsApp’s adoption of encrypted backups; Nate Jones on the artificial… [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 8:14 am
Jonathan Shaub argued that the Senate could not justify ignoring John Bolton on the grounds that it needs to protect executive privilege. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am
Deane School of Law joined Lawfare Editor-In-Chief Benjamin Wittes to discuss Meng Wanzhou’s recent deal with the Department of Justice: powered by Crowdcast A new episode of Lawfare No Bull featured testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee from top Pentagon officials about the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan: Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Ronan Bergman joined Benjamin Wittes to discuss the assassination of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh and… [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 11:47 am
Jonathan Shaub explained the upcoming political battle over the amount of information the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack will be able to access. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:54 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of of the Lawfare Podcast in which Benjamin Wittes sat down before a live audience on Twitter Spaces with Natalie Orpett, Jonathan Shaub, and Anna Bower to discuss Judge Aileen Cannon’s ruling to appoint a special master to review privilege claims over documents seized at Mar-a-Lago. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am
Rohini Kurup and Jonathan Shaub discussed a recent Justice Department filing about testimonial immunity of presidential advisers, which they argue offers clues about why Peter Navarro faces prosecution for contempt of Congress while Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino do not. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Jonathan Shaub discussed the White House’s directive not to comply with the subpoena, exploring the concepts of testimonial immunity, executive privilege, and the president’s authority over former officials. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Benjamin Wittes, Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub and Scott R. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:33 am
Hosted by Benjamin Wittes, the panel included Anna Bower, Jonathan Shaub, and Natalie Orpett. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Jonathan Shaub discusses how previously disclosed Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memoranda cover the scope and nature of executive privilege as well as the question of how constitutional disagreement between Congress and the executive branch about privilege can and should be resolved. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:40 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast that featured a conversation between Quinta Jurecic, Roger Parloff and Jonathan David Shaub about the contempt prosecution of Steve Bannon. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 7:34 am
Jonathan Shaub criticized the McGahn decision and argued that the court ignored the history of oversight and need for judicial review in its ruling. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:21 am
Jonathan Shaub proposed an understanding of executive privilege that, he argues, aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles than does much contemporary discussion of the subject. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:31 am
Jonathan Shaub wrote that the D.C. [read post]
