Search for: "Jones v. Alliance" Results 41 - 60 of 141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm by Stephanie Zable
The Trump administration released its latest escalation in the budding trade war with China on July 10: a 195-page list of $200 billion worth of Chinese goods that may soon be subject to a 10 percent tariff. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy looks at Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am by Louise Pearce
Considering Shevill v Presse Alliance SA (Case C-68/93) [1995] 2 AC 18, the ECJ had emphasised that the object of article 5(3) was to allocate jurisdiction by reference to the place where an event considered harmful occurred. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Microsoft Corp., and Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:49 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak looks at Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  In contrast, Master McCloud in Paxton Jones v Chichester Harbour Conservancy [2017] EWHC 2270 found that the deeming provisions operate as a means of calculating other deadlines, such as the acknowledgement of service and defence. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Crain (5th Cir. 2010) (revised as to other matters the following year); Jones v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am by Andrew Hamm
The re-enactment series is named for Frank Jones, a former president of the society. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
On the other hand, he has also been willing to deny qualified immunity to police officers in Section 1983 cases alleging the use of excessive force and other constitutional violations, and he has rebuked a school district for attempting to avoid providing equal access to school resources to a gay-straight alliance. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:17 am by David Post
And the promise to “prevent your employees” from providing such assistance  is laughable – unenforceable and, if it were taken seriously, would require signatories to engage in activity that  also surely inconsistent with US labor law (“Sorry, Jones, but we have to let you go, because you violated my directive not to assist in Hillary Clinton’s campaign …”) It’s the product, in my opinion, of some pretty lousy lawyering. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:48 am by Jetta Sandin
May 10, 2016)) until later this month (the opinion is currently under seal), an apparent contradiction in the federal government’s policy towards healthcare consolidation may have tilted the scales against the FTC for Judge Jones in FTC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]