Search for: "Jordan E. Bublick" Results 41 - 60 of 234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2014, 7:25 pm by Jordan Bublick
Supreme CourtChanges made by BAPCPA (2005) - a chapter 13 debtor not entitled to a discharge if filed within 4 years of a chapter 7 case Reviewed the split of authority on the issue - the majority and minority views Adopted the majority viewNoted its unpublished opinion in In re Malone (2014) - chapter 7 debtor able to avoid wholly unsecured mortgage lien (Court held it was bound by its prior published decision) Jordan E. [read post]
24 May 2014, 9:25 am by Jordan Bublick
The Court further stated that even if the statute of limitations barred foreclosure based on certain payment defaults, the mortgage lien would still be enforceable and a foreclosure action could be pursued based on breaches  or defaults in duties other than the payment requirements.(305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:59 am by Jordan E. Bublick
Jacksonville Medical Center, 690 So. 2nd 589 (Fla. 1997).(305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. [read post]
21 May 2014, 5:14 pm by Jordan E. Bublick
This stay relief attaches to the property so that a new bankruptcy filing by the Debtor or any other person will not impose an automatic stay as to the property.(305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. [read post]
17 May 2014, 8:30 pm by Jordan E. Bublick
  For other actions, a deficiency claim must be brought by the earlier of (1) five years after such action accrued or (2) by July 1, 2014.(305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. [read post]
17 May 2014, 2:54 pm by Jordan Bublick
" The Court noted that the Bankruptcy Code allows a debtor to exempt certain assets from the bankruptcy estate and that these exempt assets are generally not liable for any of the expenses in administering the bankruptcy estate.(305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:15 pm by Jordan E. Bublick
The 31% amount would cover principal, interest, taxes, insurance and associations.(305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:16 am by Jordan Bublick
"   The Court also noted that the Florida Supreme Court does not even require a property owner to reside at the property for it to have homestead statuts, but that it was sufficient that the property owner's family resides at the property and that the property owner intended to make the property his family's permanent residence. (305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. [read post]
9 May 2014, 2:15 pm by Jordan E. Bublick
In his motion for rehearing, the debtor refers to this amended statement of intention and points out that he did not oppose the motion for stay relief filed by one of the mortgagees.(305) 891-4055 - Jordan E. [read post]