Search for: "Just Right Properties, LLC" Results 41 - 60 of 2,397
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
If so, every trademark owner could send a super-notice takedown right that applies to all instances of its trademark, not just specifically identified items. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Meredith R. Miller and Laura Dooley
  In New York, the LLC Act was just signed into law, and it largely tracks the federal Corporate Transparency Act. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm by Matthew Ackerman
Please note that these are just a few of many possible ways the taking affects the property’s value. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:48 pm by Aaron Moss
The conclusory allegation that “Plaintiffs own and represent all of the intellectual property rights of the late George Carlin” likely won’t cut it. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
In his letter, Sullivan attacks my reference to ethics rules as unworthy of a professor as well as “blatantly misleading and just bad lawyering. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 10:14 am by Eric Goldman
Thus: When Gutman created the Disputed Accounts, any associated property rights belonged to someone. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by M@jux-@dmin
For a free case review, contact our Atlantic City criminal defense attorneys at the Lombardo Law Group, LLC at (609) 418-4537. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:12 am by John Elwood
Returning Relists  74 Pinehurst LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Damon Duncan
Process to Claim a Setoff A creditor cannot just perform a setoff. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
” The court next looked at Section 608 granting an estate representative the right to exercise “all of the member’s rights for the purpose of settling his or her estate or administering his or her property. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
In re Apple Hill Solar LLC, 2023 VT 57 (Apple Hill III). [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
” The Kremen test is so obviously ill-fitting to this inquiry, but the court gets to the right place: “there is no cognizable property interest in website copies that may serve as the basis for a trespass to chattels claim under California law. [read post]