Search for: "Justices of U.S. Court of Appeals (2d Cir.)" Results 41 - 60 of 1,118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal relating to whether there is a private right of action for omissions from the disclosures required by Item 303 of Regulation S-K (i.e., Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, or “MD&A”). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Sasha Volokh
On remand, my friend Ilan Wurman, law professor at Arizona State, pushed the Appointments Clause argument (among others), but his arguments were rejected by District Judge James Wesley Hendrix; this appeal follows. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
ACLU, Justice O’Connor claimed that content regulations could be analogized to “cyber-zoning” rules. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
Can a defendant have a removable colorable defense when accused of obstruction of justice or perjury? [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am by Ciara Torres-Spelliscy
Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, has significantly weakened campaign finance law. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am by Ryan Goodman
United States, 99 F.2d 864, 866 (8th Cir. 1938); Walker v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm by Marketing
Decisions from the Federal Circuit Court can be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
” VIP appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Ninth Circuit held that VIP’s dog toy was a communication of a humorous message and required heightened scrutiny to ensure that trademark protection for Jack Daniels did not intrude upon VIP’s First Amendment rights. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
” VIP appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Ninth Circuit held that VIP’s dog toy was a communication of a humorous message and required heightened scrutiny to ensure that trademark protection for Jack Daniels did not intrude upon VIP’s First Amendment rights. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
” VIP appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Ninth Circuit held that VIP’s dog toy was a communication of a humorous message and required heightened scrutiny to ensure that trademark protection for Jack Daniels did not intrude upon VIP’s First Amendment rights. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit followed the principles of Ferebee and affirmed a plaintiff’s verdict for about five million dollars. [read post]