Search for: "K. S. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 41 - 60
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Ft. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85… [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Jonathan Samet, et al., Institute of Medicine, Asbestos: Selected Health Effects (2006). [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
Carry outside the home is the norm throughout most of the country, including many large urban areas, such as the District of Columbia, Chicago, Miami, Philadelphia, San Juan, Seattle, and Houston. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm
Katz, 533, U.S. 94; 121 S. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Cobb, Jr., Lindsey K. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
L. 357-398 (2010).Vandenbergh, Michael P., et al. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
The case is currently on appeal to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:43 am
Juan Romagoza, CJA's lead plaintiff in Romagoza et. al. v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 2:00 am
Juan Romagoza, CJA's lead plaintiff in Romagoza et. al. v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
J. 363, 368 (2021). [8] Neiman Marcus v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
., several localities have banned the sale as well, as have Massachusetts and the District of Columbia. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
6, s. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
District of Columbia, 670 F.3d 1244 (D.C. [read post]
