Search for: "L Oreal USA Inc" Results 41 - 60 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2011, 6:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
LOreal USA, Inc., 2011 WL 4089902 (S.D.N.Y.)In an earlier opinion, the court found that salons had properly alleged standing to claim false advertising from defendant hair care products manufacturers' labeling of their products as available exclusively in salons. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:37 am by R. David Donoghue
Heathcote did not oppose Maybelline's motion to dismiss L'Oreal USA Creative, so long as it was given leave to replead if it later found Maybelline's representations were wrong. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:51 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.August 2, 2011 - 11 AM: L'Oreal USA, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 10:14 am
LOreal USA, Inc. appears at CCH Advertising Law Guide ¶64,162. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm by Jed
LOreal USA, Inc. et al, 10 Civ. 5063, a United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York has refused to dismiss a class action brought by beauty salon owners against well known brand manufacturers for false advertising of salon-only products. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:44 am by Sean Wajert
Inc., L'Oreal USA Inc., Kimberly-Clark Corp., and other defendants, of selling children's bath products that contain toxic and carcinogenic substances. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am by Ray Dowd
L'Oreal USA, Inc., 406 F.3d 905 (7th Cir.2005) (holding no preemption where photo model asserted right of publicity claim against photo copyright holder).It is true that Defendant's videogame is a work of authorship entitled to copyright protection, see Midway Mfg. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:32 am by randal shaheen
L'Oreal USA, a case where plaintiff alleged that the defendants marketed lipstick as “safe for use” when it contained dangerous amounts of lead, on the grounds that, in that case, there was “no allegation that the presence of lead in lipstick ha[d] any observable economic consequences. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:57 pm
L'Oreal USA, Inc. (2005) 36 Cal.4th 1028; Richards iv CH2M Hill, Inc. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 798; Romano v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
(Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) Hill Times features op-ed by Michael Geist concerning copyright lobby recycling (Michael Geist) Owner of Glo Salon and Spa sues former employees now working at competitor for $6.4 million in damages over alleged misappropriation of trade secrets in the form of client lists and client colour cards (IP Osgoode) Federal court issues practice direction aimed at streamlining complex litigation (International Law Office)   China Get involved in Chinese IP policy… [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for ‘PharmaResearch’ due… [read post]