Search for: "Lange v. Andrews"
Results 41 - 60
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2022, 1:17 am
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
In Jones Lange LaSalle Brokerage, Inc. v. 1441 L Associates, LLC, No. 22-046, JLL represented both parties to an agreement to lease property in northwest Washington, DC. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
Bauer, Thomas Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 2:07 am
Less than four months before the launch of the new system, Kluwer IP Law interviewed Véron and asked him how it all started. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 2:32 am
A copy of the decision can be found here More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Artificial Intelligence and Patents: An International Perspective on Patenting AI-Related Inventions by Jonathan P. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:00 am
Orwig, Lee Anderson, Andrea Ryan Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am
Rice, Jon Berglund, Mark Kelly, Mark Ring, Jeffrey Bernlohr, Andrew Kenly, Rich Risk, David J. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am
Allen, Jacob Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:16 am
As readers will be well aware, one of the preferred hobbies of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) is to issue controversial judgments in intellectual property matters which, quite often, instead of providing guidance to national courts, raise more questions than they answer. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
The judge considered the factors on secondary indications set out by Laddie J in Haberman v Jackel [1999] F.S.R. 683 (and approved by Jacob LJ in Schlumberger v Electromagnetic Geoservices [2010] EWC Civ 819). [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
Advanced Cell Diagnostics v Molecular Instruments [2024] EWHC 898 (Pat) On 23 April 2024, Mr Justice Meade handed down his judgment in the dispute between Advanced Cell Diagnostics (ACD) and Molecular Instruments (MI). [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:29 am
Andrew M. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
In Lange v Atkinson [2000] 3 NZLR 385 the Court of Appeal criticized and declined to follow Reynolds, for the reason that they had altered “the structure of the law of qualified privilege in a way which adds to the uncertainty and chilling effect almost inevitably present in this area of the law”. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 6:33 am
Norwitz and Sabastian V. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:12 am
Andrew M. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:47 am
Andrew Hollins, Defendant-Appellant.2008 WL 2201448, 2008 N.Y. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 6:31 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
