Search for: "Lens.com"
Results 41 - 60
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2012, 7:16 am
Lens.com, Inc., 755 F.Supp. 2d 1151 (D. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:38 am
Lens.com, Inc., 722 F.3d 1229, 1245-49 (10th Cir. 2013).) 1-800 Contacts’ bidding agreements, comprising nearly 80 percent of the online retail market for lenses, reached far beyond the brand’s property rights, restraining trade and harming consumers. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 7:20 am
Lens.com decision from last month] [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:04 am
Lens.com, Inc., 755 F.Supp. 2d 1151 (D. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 4:06 pm
Lens.com. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
(Lens.com claimed it incurred at least $1.4M of defense costs). [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:38 am
Lens.com, Inc., 722 F.3d 1229 (10th Cir. 2013) and Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
Lens.com, Inc., 2011 WL 5403368 (D. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
Lens.com, Inc., 722 F.3d 1229 (10th Cir.2013); Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 10:07 am
Lens.com (2010); Montana Camo v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 11:27 am
Lens.com Inc., 2:2007cv00591 (filed 08/13/2007) * 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:48 am
Only Lens.com fought back and largely prevailed in the suit. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
* Update on the Lens.com v. 1-800 Contacts antitrust lawsuit. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Lens.com ruling, we may never see another successful initial interest confusion-keyword advertising case again. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
Jeanne Fromer & Barton Beebe, NYU School of Law The Future of Trademark Depletion in a Global, Multilingual Economy: Evidence and Lessons from the European Union TMs transcend boundaries b/c brands transcend boundaries; even small businesses are often looking beyond borders to other countries. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:54 am
Lens.com, Inc., 722 F.3d 1229 (10th Cir. 2013). * Nespresso USA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:33 am
Lens.com, the financial futility of keyword litigation, and Tre Milano. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:54 pm
Lens.com ruling. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
Lens.com opinion, which held that a 1.5% clickthrough rate proved that there was NOT legally sufficient initial interest confusion because it was well below the standard 10-15% net confusion threshold courts normally require. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
Starting in 2002 and continuing for about a decade, 1-800 Contacts systematically locked up many of its online contact lenses retail competitors into settlement agreements that prohibited the parties from bidding on each other’s trademarks at the search engines. [read post]
