Search for: "Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A." Results 41 - 60 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2016, 11:09 am by Ron Coleman
In 2010 I wrote this post about a now-notorious case, eventually ensconced as Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:12 am by Cheryl Beise
Cheryl BeiseA seller of parody tote bags that prevailed on trademark infringement, dilution, and copyright infringement claims brought by Louis Vuitton was not entitled to recover attorney fees. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 10:28 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
Like the district court, we conclude that the remaining fair-use factors either weigh in MOB's favor or are irrelevant, see Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:21 am by Ron Coleman
See Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 3:24 pm by David Cosgrove
  Noting that “the overlap of the issues in the criminal and civil cases is a significant factor,” the court proceeded to apply the remaining five (5) of the six (6) factors set forth in Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 2:27 pm by Larry Munn
Following cases such as Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:30 am
From Law.com: A biting satire it may not have been, but Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 12:23 pm by Brian Wm. Higgins
  Rounding out the top 5 was a Fourth Circuit opinion regarding Louis Vuitton's trademark infringement case against Haute Diggity Dog: Downloading Music Benefits Both Consumers and Artists, Study Finds Bouchat Sues Ravens, NFL Over "Flying B" Design Maryland IP Jobs Board America Invents Act: Redefining What is "Prior Art" Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:54 am by Arina Shulga
A good example of fair use parody in trademark law is the “Chewy Vuitton” case (Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:50 pm
 On Nov. 13, the Fourth Circuit found doggie-toy maker Haute Diggity Dog, LLC did not dilute Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:11 am by Daniel Corbett
  The Fourth Circuit’s decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:18 am by gmlevine
The initials “LV” could stand for Louis Vuitton, as the Complainant alleges in Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]