Search for: "Michael Dorf"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 10:06 am
And at “Dorf on Law,” Michael C. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Dorf is the Robert S. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Professor of Law Director of Clinical Legal Education UC Davis School of Law Rosalind Dixon Professor of Law University of New South Wales Michael Dorf Robert S. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
” Michael C. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:23 am
” Michael C. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 2:59 pm
Michael C. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
Meanwhile, as Professors William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen have documented in a widely cited forthcoming article in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, there are other oddities of Griffin’s Case that make it a particularly poor authority on the meaning of Section 3.Trump’s team will lodge other objections. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: What We Learned from the NYT Behind-the Scenes Revelations About Dobbs (Michael Dorf, Dorf on Law) The Echo Chamber Grows (Adam Feldman, Empirical SCOTUS) A Supreme Court Icon at 100 Years Old (Tony Mauro, ALM) Democrats ramp up pressure on Clarence Thomas to recuse himself in Trump case (Tobi Raji & Maegan Vasquez, Washington Post) Sandra Day O’Connor’s legacy extends far beyond the Supreme Court, her son says (Rachel… [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:58 am
Dorf has this post at his blog, “Dorf on Law. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:15 pm
Immediately”: Michael C. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:14 pm
Dorf has this essay online at Justia’s Verdict. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Dorf is the Robert S. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:01 am
"It's actually quite complicated and context-specific" is the only right answer, but any attempt to delineate complications and context would be attacked as lawyerly or insufficiently human.In other words, this is ultimately not an echo of the 1988 presidential faux-debate in which Michael Dukakis responded to a weird (and frankly disgusting) hypothetical question about his wife being raped and murdered by offering a canned response about the death penalty. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:26 pm
Dorf has this post at his blog, “Dorf on Law. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
” Although one can never be certain of the outcome based on the questions asked at oral argument, the Court’s conservative super-majority seemed receptive to the Seventh Amendment rights claim of the respondents.In an essay on the Dorf on Law blog last week, I explained why the Supreme Court should reject the Seventh Amendment claim, even as I acknowledged that a majority probably will accept it. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:56 am
Dorf has this post at his blog, “Dorf on Law. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:07 am
In October 2012, I wrote complementary Verdict and Dorf on Law columns in which I explained why the Republican Party by that time had clearly revealed its sociopathic foundations.In particular, I pointed out in the Verdict column that Republicans of the day -- most definitely including that year's Republican presidential nominee, Mitt Romney -- had "openly advocated policies that harm innocent people—and they have adopted methods to achieve those ends that simply… [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:11 am
” Michael C. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 9:40 am
” Law professor Michael C. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:00 pm
Dorf is the Robert S. [read post]
