Search for: "Motion Theory Inc"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 7:05 am
In Tolmar Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:05 am
In Tolmar Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 6:20 am
Lynn of Indiana Legal Services, Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 6:53 pm
Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.The federal district court in New York City yesterday denied a “consumer’s” motion to intervene in the Justice Department’s action against Apple, Inc. and five publishers for allegedly conspiring to fix prices for electronic books or “e-books. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:24 am
’s (“Samsung”) motion to strike sections of Respondents Spansion, Inc. and Spansion LLC’s (collectively, “Spansion”) prehearing brief and preclude hearing testimony by Spansion relating to new prior art invalidity theories not discussed in Spansion’s expert report on invalidity. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 3:08 pm
Hearing Components, Inc v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
The parties’ post-trial motions are an amalgam of legal theory and evidentiary claims that frequently cite legal precedents that led some amici to argue before trial that the CFTC’s suit against DRW sought to lower the standard for holding traders liable for market manipulation (CFTC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 1:26 pm
Stark in Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 12:58 pm
’s (“Cross Match”) motion to reconsider granting Respondents Suprema, Inc. and Mentalix, Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:26 am
Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm
Bard, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
Texas Instruments, Inc., C.A. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:30 pm
Lyon Management Group, Inc., where the defendant won a summary judgment motion, before hearing a certification motion, and then asked the court to go back and certify the case. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:27 pm
The Panel suggested that the parties cooperate, but declined plaintiffs’ motion to centralize the cases. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:40 am
Robinson recently considered an early Rule 11 motion filed by several defendants in HBAC Matchmaker Media, Inc. v. [read post]
Judge Stark denies motion to supplement expert reports, grants summary judgment of non-infringement.
29 Mar 2012, 10:31 am
Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:31 am
See Standard Haven Products, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:25 am
Following an order excluding the report of plaintiff's damages expert, the court denied plaintiff's motion to allow its damages expert to present a "per-user" theory of damages because the theory was fatally flawed. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:59 am
In K-Beech, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:09 am
According to the Order, Respondent SKC Kolon PI, Inc. [read post]
