Search for: "Mr. Saunder" Results 41 - 60 of 238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2017, 8:00 am by Joel Whitney
Slick praises Frances Stonor Saunders’s book Who Paid the Piper?. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:13 am
 The panel was a veritable who's who with Margot Frohlinger (Principal Direcotr, Patent Law and Multilateral Affairs, EPO), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, London), Trevor Cook (WilmerHale), Judge Klaus Grabinski (Federal Supreme Court, Karlsruhe), John Pegram (Fish & Richardson), Nicholas Saunders (Barrister, Brick Court Chambers) and Joel Smith (Herbert Smith Freehills). [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:39 am
Issues surrounding sovereignty have received increasing attention over the last few years, most recently in Congress’s decision regarding Saudi Arabian immunity. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 7:38 pm
 Panellists: Ms Charlotte May QC (8 New Square), Dr Nicholas Saunders (Brick Court Chambers), Mr Kiaron Whitehead (BPI)18:50 - Conference ends and drinksThe event is FREE but registration is required. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:20 pm by Danika Casey
Commissioner Saunders found that Mr Kedwell’s conduct in intentionally preventing X from turning off the Highway did not fall within the scope of, and therefore did not contravene, either of the policies. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:20 pm by emagraken
Justice Saunders provided the following reasons: [37]         I find that Mr. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 2:45 pm by emagraken
However, the judge made the appellant’s evidence of his education one leg of what was a relatively brief discussion of credibility, and that leg is broken. [58]         I would echo the words of Mr. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 6:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Essentially, this is a recognition that (as I said above), had Mr. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 6:48 am by Doug Cornelius
That guidance “gave cooties” to impact investing and had a “chilling effect” on its use in plans governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, said Mr. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
Where, as in Saunders v United Kingdom (1997) 23 EHRR 313 and the present case, a person is asked questions at a stage when he has not been charged and the questioning does not form part of a criminal investigation, article 6 will not be engaged. [read post]