Search for: "Mrs. Holt (Doe One)" Results 41 - 60 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2014, 1:08 pm by Shafik Bhalloo
  Section 113 does not apply in respect of a determination issued under section 119. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:21 am by Rosalind English
However, the statutory procedure in this case was a special one. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 11:53 am by Eugene Volokh
And if the state supreme court does answer the question, then the result should prove quite influential. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Finally, how does all of this influence a company's purchase of directors and officers liability insurance? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am by velvel
Pointing out that such a pecuniary interest rendered it unconstitutional for the mayor to decide on the defendants liability, the Court also said, “With his interest as mayor in the financial condition of the village and his responsibility therefore, might not a defendant with reason say that he feared he could not get a fair trial or a fair sentence from one who would have so strong a motive to help his village by conviction and a heavy fine? [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
Of course, this reasoning does not apply to what one might call an extravagant case where the promise does not, on any view, justify a claim based on detrimental reliance. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
Of course, this reasoning does not apply to what one might call an extravagant case where the promise does not, on any view, justify a claim based on detrimental reliance. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
Of course, this reasoning does not apply to what one might call an extravagant case where the promise does not, on any view, justify a claim based on detrimental reliance. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:44 pm by John McFarland
Tudor Holt & Pickering, who analyze the oil and gas industry, published a critique of Mr. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
One answer to this, perhaps drawing on Gillett v Holt, is that a lack of clarity can be made up by the extent of the detriment undertaken by the Claimant (?). [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
One answer to this, perhaps drawing on Gillett v Holt, is that a lack of clarity can be made up by the extent of the detriment undertaken by the Claimant (?). [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
October 31,  2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 2:26 am
  Pendergest-Holt’s motion seeks clarification that the receivership order does not apply to the D&O policy proceeds, and alternatively seeks authorization for disbursement of the D&O policy proceeds for payment of her defense expense. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 5:46 am
Today I noticed that Matthew Holt, one of my favorite health care policy bloggers, speculates a bit on which large lady will chant, WebMD, Google, Revolution Health or Microsoft. [read post]