Search for: "NYS Dept. of Education" Results 41 - 60 of 383
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2022, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Bd. of Educ. (1999) (to be actionable, harassment must be "so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively bars the victim's access to an educational opportunity or benefit"). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Whitfield-Ortiz v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 116 AD3d 580, 581 [1st Dept 2014]; Askin v Department of Educ. of City of N.Y., 110 AD3d 621, 622 [1st Dept 2013]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Whitfield-Ortiz v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 116 AD3d 580, 581 [1st Dept 2014]; Askin v Department of Educ. of City of N.Y., 110 AD3d 621, 622 [1st Dept 2013]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:00 am by Monica Williamson
Pueblo of Laguna Family Legal Assistance Attorney; Dept: Government Affairs Office; Closing date for application submission – June 15, 2022. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Dist. 2022 NY Slip Op 03655 Decided on June 3, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Dist. 2022 NY Slip Op 03655 Decided on June 3, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]