Search for: "Nan Aron" Results 41 - 60 of 96
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2011, 6:23 am by Nabiha Syed
” At the Huffington Post, Nan Aron argues that “the ethics code is not an onerous straitjacket designed to keep Supreme Court justices out of the public eye,” but instead “builds a common-sense ethical firewall built around political activity, fundraising, and relationships that create an appearance of impropriety. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:50 am by Lovechilde
— EJS President Eva Paterson joined Nan Aron (Alliance for Justice), U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:07 am by Tony Mauro
In a statement Sunday Nan Aron, president of Alliance for Justice, said the story raised questions about the "accuracy and completeness" of Thomas's financial disclosure forms and about the "ethical environment within the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:59 pm by Ashby Jones
Nan Aron, president of the liberal Alliance for Justice, told the BLT that she has awaited a Senate vote since Obama nominated Liu in February 2010. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:06 pm by David Ingram
Nan Aron, president of the liberal Alliance for Justice, said she and other activists have waited with anticipation for a Senate vote since Obama nominated Liu in February 2010. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:28 pm by Deepak Gupta
  Here's a small sampling: Byron Williams, While you were away, the Supreme Court did it again, San Jose Mercury News Nan Aron, The Corporate Court Does It Again, Huffington Post Sacramento Bee editorial San Francisco Chronicle editorial Times-Union editorial Kansas-City Star editorial Steve Berk, Consumers Lose Again, The Corporate Observer Jeff Gelles, Supreme Court takes a big step toward shutting consumers out, Philadelphia Inquirer Nathan Koppel, Will Federal… [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am by James Bickford
  Byron Williams of the San Jose Mercury News, Nan Aron at the Huffington Post, Kenneth Jost of Jost on Justice and Jeff Gelles of the Philadelphia Inquirer all criticize the decision in opinion pieces. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am by Joe Consumer
As Nan Aron at the Alliance for Justice wrote, "if Wal-Mart succeeds, not only will women at Wal-Mart be unable to change pay and promotion disparities, but future lawsuits related to employment discrimination, civil rights, antitrust violations, and consumer protection will be significantly hampered, discouraging cases brought by large groups of people against broad-based corporate malfeasance. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am by Joe Consumer
As Nan Aron at the Alliance for Justice wrote, "if Wal-Mart succeeds, not only will women at Wal-Mart be unable to change pay and promotion disparities, but future lawsuits related to employment discrimination, civil rights, antitrust violations, and consumer protection will be significantly hampered, discouraging cases brought by large groups of people against broad-based corporate malfeasance. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:02 am by James Bickford
  On the op-ed page of the Washington Post, Nan Aron argues that it should, and she notes that “[r]egardless of whether one shares fears of politicization, disputes are inevitable so long as the nation’s highest court operates with almost no compulsory ethics rules to guide — or constrain — behavior. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:40 pm
"An ethics code for the high court": Nan Aron will have this op-ed Monday in The Washington Post. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 9:43 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
" Nan Aron, director of the liberal group Alliance for Justice, said that if these rules were extended to the Supreme Court, none of the justices could attend "overtly political meetings or events" like those sponsored by the Kochs.And who will be the judge of which meetings and events are overtly political? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:21 am by Glenn Reynolds
And can we get Nan Aron of the Alliance for Justice to weigh in on Common Cause ralliers’ calls for Clarence Thomas to be lynched? [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:06 am by Kiran Bhat
In the Huffington Post, Nan Aron criticizes the decision in Citizens United and declares that the “Corporate Court” is “still open for business,” while Joel M. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:42 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Politico Ciara Torres-Spelliscy Meredith McGehee Ellen Miller Katrina vanden Heuvel TPM Nick Gillespie Nan Aron MORE: Southern Studies... [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Adam Chandler
The Los Angeles Times reports that Justice Scalia’s decision to participate “is drawing fire from some who worry the court is injecting itself into partisan politics” – a point echoed by Nan Aron in the Huffington Post, where she writes that a “fundamental principle of our democracy is undermined when Supreme Court justices serve as willing agents of a transparently political entity like the Tea Party movement . . . . [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:43 pm by Deepak Gupta
Supreme Court, Businessweek Lawyers USA, Supreme Court hears AT&T class action waiver dispute, Daily Record Brendan Fischer, Supreme Court Considers Corporate Right to Mandatory Arbitration, Center for Media and Democracy David Heath, High Court Ponders If Companies Can Force Consumers to Sign Away Right to Class-Action Suits, Center for Public Integrity Erika Morphy, A lot hinges on SC's ruling in $30 cellphone sales case, E-Commerce Times Scott Lemieux, Consumer Protection at the Supreme… [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:34 pm by pittlegalscholarship
Santa Clara Social Justice and Public Service Nan Aron (President, Alliance for Justice) presents “Pursuing Justice: A Life in Public Interest Law. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 7:50 am by Norm Pattis
With the high number of vacancies, their ability to stand up for their rights will be unacceptably delayed," Litchwick quotes Nan Aron at the Alliance for Justice as saying.I've got news for Lithwick: Fill the court with a bunch of paper-pushing bench jockeys and ordinary Americans still aren't going to get justice. [read post]