Search for: "Neil S Brady" Results 41 - 60 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse weighs in on the debut of Justice Neil Gorsuch, finding it “no real surprise” that Gorsuch “turned out to be a hard-right conservative,” but remarking on “the sheer flamboyance of the junior justice’s behavior. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage of Neil Gorsuch’s debut on the court comes from Greg Stohr at Bloomberg and Robert Barnes in The Washington Post, who concludes that “Gorsuch is a Scalia 2.0, perhaps further to the right. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:12 am by Steve Vladeck
And with Justice Anthony Kennedy (and Justice Neil Gorsuch) joining the remaining Trevino dissenters to cabin the scope of Martinez and Trevino, the scale appears to have tipped, at least for the moment, back in Coleman’s direction. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:56 pm by Amy Howe
I covered some of the highlights from those orders in an earlier post, but today’s orders also included an unusually high number of separate opinions regarding the cases in which the court acted – including three by the court’s newest justice, Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:41 am by Mark Walsh
This case involves a notorious murder of a woman in the District of Columbia in 1984, and whether certain evidence the government had withheld from the defense was “material” under Brady v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am by NCC Staff
President Donald Trump’s successful nominee, Neil Gorsuch, will only hear a few cases in the current term. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
But the court did not schedule it for oral argument until March 2017, by which point Justice Neil Gorsuch had been nominated but not yet confirmed. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule in a 1984 Washington, D.C., murder case, and Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the “Senate Judiciary Committee is set to vote on the nomination of federal appeals court Judge Neil Gorsuch just 62 days after his nomination by President Trump — a vote Republicans denied President Barack Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, for 293 days last year. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule in a 1984 Washington, D.C., murder case. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:49 pm by Jon Katz
Today, I hit the jackpot by hearing two particularly important criminal oral arguments, one on the prosecution’s duty to disclose Brady/exculpatory evidence to the criminal defense lawyer (Overton v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Molly Runkle
Today the Senate Judiciary Committee held the second day of its hearing on the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the so-called Brady rule, maintaining that at “the heart of this case is a conundrum implicating the ‘materiality’ standard,” and that courts “around the country have demonstrated a reluctance to grant defendants new trials under Brady, rendering the materiality standard a very difficult one for defendants to meet. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Divorce & Hidden Money: Suing Your Spouse For Fraudulently Conveying Assets – Manhattan fraud investigation lawyer Fred Abrams in his Asset Search Blog SEC Announces Focus Areas for Second Round of Cybersecurity Exams of Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers – Hoyt Stastney and Josh Hufford of Quarles & Brady on the firm’s blog, Safe & Sound The SEC Turns Up The Heat On Financial Reporting Fraud – Washington, DC lawyer Lou… [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:13 am by Steve Kalar
Id. at *2 n.3 Why wasn’t this identification procedure unduly suggestive (thus violating due process) under Neil v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 5:02 am by SHG
  And if it takes Neil Barsky’s promotional skills to do so, so what? [read post]