Search for: "Nelson v. Nelson"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,048
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2024, 2:37 pm
Tuesday’s Cantero v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
A partial dissenting opinion argued that the majority applied too strict a test regarding the penny stock bar (SEC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:27 am
A case heard recently in the County Courts, Byrne v Harwood-Delgado has now found that a section 21 could not be used to end a tenancy if the landlord has not had a valid gas certificate prior to the tenancy starting. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:48 pm
Analyzing this Important California Privacy Decision The origin of California Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Philpot v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:50 am
Here are the opinions in Nelson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:09 am
Back in September, Dean Eboni Nelson posted on Duncan Kennedy's The Bitter Ironies of Williams v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 7:42 am
Indeed, in a 1983 case, Herrera v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am
“The Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists’ report of an alleged successful attack on M/V Ocean Jazz is patently false,” the U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 2:40 pm
From Nelson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:54 pm
Two days ago, I somewhat critiqued Judge Nelson's analysis of when circuit precedent is sufficiently inconsistent with a subsequent Supreme Court decision to no longer bind a panel.Today, Judge Bress authors a lengthy opinion that, in my view, is exactly the right way to do about doing precisely that.Personally, I hope (and think) that the defendant will prevail in this trademark dispute, just as it did in the district court and in the Ninth Circuit's original opinion. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
”Follow @ljstprof Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Ex Parte Young.Judge Nelson's opinion expressly concedes that "Wolfe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division noted the decision in Sindoni v Board of Educ. of Skaneateles Cent. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division noted the decision in Sindoni v Board of Educ. of Skaneateles Cent. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Nelson, No. 2115 EDA 2021 (Pa. [read post]
