Search for: "Oral Folks"
Results 41 - 60
of 819
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
"People don't mind it when folks criticize a President, Senator, or Governor for lying but for some reason we are not allowed to use that word in connection with the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 3:35 pm
.'"From "Supreme Court seems to side with web designer opposed to same-sex marriage/Colorado’s Lorie Smith says being forced to create websites for gay couples would violate her right to free speech" by Robert Barnes , reports on the oral argument in 303 Creative v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
Let’s hope that at oral argument someone holds Petitioners to account for their shabby behavior, behavior that should trouble members of the Court who are serious about originalism and professionalism. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 8:28 am
“Many of the folks we represent were farming as a part of their livelihood, providing products that the others of us use,” May said. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:48 am
The rights of women and LGBTQ folks cannot be meaningfully ascertained by looking back in history to times when those groups had virtually no rights. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 6:51 am
This would be pretty powerful since the folks who are working on the litigation have some of the best information about the patents themselves. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:30 am
She begins the book with the oral argument in the abortion case Whole Women's Health in 2016, when the three female Justices dominated the oral arguments and "we really could see gender equality from our back porches. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 3:53 pm
Sorry, folks, I know it’s the last thing on your mind. [read post]
24 Sep 2022, 8:26 am
Folks, it’s time. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
There is still plenty of time for editing, so we'd love to hear any recommendations you folks might have; in the meantime, you can read the entire PDF of the latest draft (though with some formatting glitches stemming from the editing process) here.] [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 8:27 am
Although nobody testified that the 2019 system as created actually existed before the critical date, folks did testify that the 2019 system “could have” existed. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 5:32 am
There is still plenty of time for editing, so we'd love to hear any recommendations you folks might have; in the meantime, you can read the entire PDF of the latest draft (though with some formatting glitches stemming from the editing process) here.] [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:22 am
The post observes that Times Square as defined for the purposes of the firearm ban may vary somewhat compared to how some folks have traditionally defined Times Square. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
(Relatedly, many folks assume that if one reads a large enough number of cases, the answer sought will clearly present itself.) [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm
In a decision whose result is cheered by country-folk like me who struggle with poor internet access, the Court in Viasat, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:30 pm
(Note: IJ filed an amicus brief in this case and participated at oral argument). [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 1:02 pm
Maybe the oral argument was especially testy. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 7:37 am
We launched the podcast, working with the good folks at Goat Rodeo, with the softest of soft-launches. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Posted on Civil Rights Blog / Blog / Fact Check: Do Police Have a Duty To Protect Individuals Fact Check: Do Police Have a Duty To Protect Individuals? [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
(If you are interested, this oral argument featured Don Verrilli v. [read post]
