Search for: "PEDERSEN, Officer" Results 41 - 60 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2012, 6:24 am by Cormac Early
Office of Personnel Management. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 4:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
Office of Personnel Management (docket 12-231). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:12 am by Sam E. Antar
If it weren't for the heroic efforts of the FBI, SEC, Postal Inspector's Office, US Attorney's Office, and class action plaintiff's lawyers who investigated, prosecuted, and sued me, I would still be the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie today. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 7:00 pm by Susan Schneider
This reception will provide an opportunity for alumni to visit with Judge Looney and Professors Hamilton and Pedersen. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:06 pm by Russell Powell
In the latest of a series of decisions striking down DOMA, today in Pedersen v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:50 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
This just in …  GLAD, the legal team representing the Plaintiffs in the Pedersen v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:56 pm by Jamie Reese
Office of Personnel Management, another challenge to Section 3 of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) [text]. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 11:56 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Pottow, University of Michigan, Ann Arbour, Professor Jingxia (Josie) Shi, China University of International Business & Economics, Beijing and Professor Ulrik Rammeskow Bang-Pedersen, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:01 am by CJLF Staff
While in solitary confinement he earned time off for good behavior and Pedersen was released three months early. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:11 pm by Edward M. McNally
  Such action must have a "compelling justification" and the simple desire to avoid being thrown out of office, even by scalawags, is not enough. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 11:09 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Office of Personnel Management and responded to GLAD’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:43 am by Andrew Koppelman
In his motion to dismiss in Pedersen v. [read post]