Search for: "POM Wonderful, LLC"
Results 41 - 60
of 190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2015, 4:42 am
Par responded that Pom Wonderful changed the game. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Last year, in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 3:26 am
See Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:26 pm
Indeed on Friday, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit found that in the case of advertising claims made by pomegranate juice maker POM Wonderful, the FTC went too far in requiring two human clinical trial studies to support any health claims in advertising. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
POM Wonderful’s advertising claims were false and deceptive. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 6:08 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s January 30th ruling that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) can prohibit POM Wonderful LLC from advertising that its products are effective in combating illnesses and conditions such as heart disease, prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:43 am
A few years ago, I wrote a column addressing a case in which Pom Wonderful LLC sued Coca Cola Company in connection with the marketing of one of its pomegranate-blueberry juice products. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 1:12 pm
POM Wonderful, LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 12:49 pm
Circuit on Friday affirmed an FTC order that required POM Wonderful, LLC, to support future ads with claims of health benefits with one scientific study. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld claims of false advertising by POM Wonderful LLC (“POM Wonderful”), finding that the government could prohibit the pomegranate juice company from advertising its products as being effective in fighting heart disease, prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld claims of false advertising by POM Wonderful LLC (“POM Wonderful”), finding that the government could prohibit the pomegranate juice company from advertising its products as being effective in fighting heart disease, prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld claims of false advertising by POM Wonderful LLC (“POM Wonderful”), finding that the government could prohibit the pomegranate juice company from advertising its products as being effective in fighting heart disease, prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 8:59 am
POM Wonderful, LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
But has IP any peculiarity woman-wise, wonders Jeremy? [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
Circuit issued its opinion in POM Wonderful, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Is that fair, wonders Neil? [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
. so that it is administratively feasible to determine whether a particular person is a class member”); In re POM Wonderful LLC, 2014 WL 1225184, at *6 (C.D. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
