Search for: "Pacer System" Results 41 - 60 of 919
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by Robert Ambrogi
A federal lawsuit challenging as excessive the fees charged by PACER, the federal courts’ electronic records system, has been certified as a class action. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:48 am by Jennifer Stephens
Just saw this:NEWS RELEASEJudiciary Approves PACER Innovations To Enhance Public Access March 16, 2010 — The Judicial Conference of the United States today approved key steps to improve public access to federal courts by increasing the availability of court opinions and expanding the services and reducing the costs for many users of the Public Access to Electronic Court Records (PACER) system. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 8:04 am by Lucie Olejnikova
NextGen CM/ECF replaces the older CM/ECF system and provides improvements for users, including a single sign-on for PACER and NextGen CM/ECF. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:52 pm by Michel-Adrien
The explanation was that the documents from those courts were on older legacy court management systems that were not compatible with the newer PACER platform.Good news. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 10:35 am by Bonnie Shucha
As of last week, PACER, the website of the U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 3:26 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
CRS Legal Sidebar, Legislative and Judicial Developments Affecting Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) Updated February 1, 2022: “The Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER)system is the U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Steven
Federal Courts’ system for electronic access called PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:59 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The account upgrades are a feature of the Federal Judiciary’s next generation (NextGen) Case Management/ Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system, which will allow you to use the same account for both PACER and e-filing access as courts implement NextGen CM/ECF. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:27 am by Stephen Schultze
Courts reported that the PACER system was being inundated with requests. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 7:15 am by Colleen Ostiguy
According to the Judicial Conference of the US, the following changes were approved to PACER: ? [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Robert Ambrogi
After nearly a year of effort, the Free Law Project has downloaded every opinion and order from the federal courts’ PACER system and has made them available for search through its RECAP archive of PACER documents. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm by Kristen Matteucci
According to Matt Ford of The New Republic, PACER fees brought in over $146 million in fiscal year 2016, though it cost just $3 million to keep the system running. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:23 pm
Courts to improve PACER by enhancing the authenticity, usability and availability of the system. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:47 am by sue.altmeyer@law.csuohio.edu
The federal court docket system, PACER, normally charges 8 cents a page for access, which will  increase to ten cents a page on April 1, 2012. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:06 am by SchuylerCook
From our friends at United States Courts:75 Percent of PACER Users Won’t Pay for Access Under New Fee Schedule July 09, 2010 A recent change in the fee exemption policy of the Federal Judiciary’s Public Access to Court Electronic Records system means that 75 percent of PACER users won’t pay any fee this year. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:40 pm by Amul Kalia and Vera Eidelman
  Though this change appears to be part of PACER’s attempt to join the 21st Century—the removal is part of PACER’s migration to its NextGen system, which is incompatible with the decades-old legacy systems holding these records—it stands in sharp contrast to the Supreme Court’s acknowledgement in Nixon v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:19 pm by Jason Kelley
The PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) system could and should play a crucial role in fulfilling that need. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 10:43 am
“Young attorneys who want to use their law degree to make a difference deserve the same access to the federal court system as their wealthy corporate counterparts. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:40 pm by Erika Wayne
The increase in the electronic public access (EPA) fee, from $.08 to $.10 per page, is needed to continue to support and improve the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system, and to develop and implement the next generation of the Judiciary’s Case Management/Electronic Case Filing system. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 1:05 am
The author provides a thoughtful and comprehensive analysis of the PACER system. [read post]