Search for: "Paradox Holdings, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 88
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
Paradoxically, perhaps, the project of legalization evidences how a love of ancient custom, in this case the customs and patterns of the post-Westphalian law-state, remains, while power shifts to those, enterprises included, that have brought about a revolution in the state and in the meaning of legalization in a new world order that has yet to be revealed. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Sarah Andropoulos
Acknowledging that although under existing law an employee can marry a same-sex partner on a Saturday and in many states be fired for doing so the following Monday, the court determined that this “paradox [was] not [its] concern” in the sense that it was only tasked here with interpreting Title VII’s sex discrimination provision. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:37 pm by Howard Knopf
Here are recent example of post-hearing pendency delays before a decision was rendered:•        Commercial Radio = ~ 30 months•        K-12 I =  ~ 24 months•        K-12 II  = ~ 20 months•        Fitness = ~ 26 months•        Re:Sound Tariff 8 (“Pandora”) = ~ 18… [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
If the case is adjudicated on the merits, often the district court judge will hold that the substantive findings legally preclude all the other non-representative claims. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:07 am
DRL Enterprises, Inc., Opposition No. 91158276, et al. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 7:40 pm by Jason Rantanen
And although some district courts have acknowledged this paradox, the argument tends to be successful as it was in McRO, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm by Chuck Cosson
  I cannot use the vase on my table (in Seattle) to hold flowers growing in Maryland unless either the vase or the flowers move location. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Second, there was the important data protection decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
A few weeks ago, Virginia Delegate Rich Anderson (R) and Senator Richard Stuart (R) introduced an amendment in the Virginia General Assembly, HJR 578, which would amend the Virginia constitution by replacing the state equivalent of the Fourth Amendment with an all new version designed to be an ‘update’ for the 21st century. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 3:34 pm by Legal Talk Network
Ed holds master's degrees from University of Maryland and the Army War College. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
The post also raises the unexplained paradox why courts are more solicitous of publicity rights than Lanham Act claims, even though the latter involves consumer confusion/deception while the former doesn't.] [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am by Brandon Kain
Paradoxically, the result is a new approach to the role of superior courts and provincial legislatures in the Canadian federation, which raises more questions than it answers. [read post]