Search for: "Pereira v. US"
Results 41 - 60
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2021, 12:58 pm
The litigation in Niz-Chavez built upon a similar case, Pereira v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
Pereira (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 1246; Bustillos v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
Pereira (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 1246; Bustillos v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 3:50 am
Appling; and Pereira v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
Dusty: How about Pereira? [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 2:49 am
As far as I am aware the House of Lords/Supreme Court have never looked at the question of vulnerability and this case would appear ripe for the Supreme Court to look again at Pereira and to see if it is – to use the oft quoted phrase – fit for purpose 16 years on. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 2:49 am
As far as I am aware the House of Lords/Supreme Court have never looked at the question of vulnerability and this case would appear ripe for the Supreme Court to look again at Pereira and to see if it is – to use the oft quoted phrase – fit for purpose 16 years on. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 5:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm
It was recently considered in Bank of Scotland v Pereira [2011] EWCA Civ 241 where guidelines were set out.Following that decision, the present case would appear to be a paradigm example where an application under CPR 39.3(3) should have been made.The Ws argued that the appeal should still be considered and that it was not an abuse to have appealed rather than applying to set aside and the appeal had been made before Pereira. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm
It was recently considered in Bank of Scotland v Pereira [2011] EWCA Civ 241 where guidelines were set out.Following that decision, the present case would appear to be a paradigm example where an application under CPR 39.3(3) should have been made.The Ws argued that the appeal should still be considered and that it was not an abuse to have appealed rather than applying to set aside and the appeal had been made before Pereira. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 10:58 am
This unsurprising conclusion is reminiscent of Mehta v J Pereira Fernandes SA [2006] EWHC 813 in which the same was held for an e-mail address appearing at the top of an e-mail.If the name ‘Alex’ was not generated automatically, clearly it purported to be used as a signature.If the name ‘Alex’ was auto-generated, then on the authority of Neocleous v Rees that would constitute a signature. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:44 am
Dupont de Nemours & Co v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
Pereira Castillo, que enmendaría el Artículo 404 de la Ley de Sustancias Controladas de Puerto Rico con el fin de enmendar sus disposiciones en torno a la posesión de marihuana. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 3:50 am
The BIA also cited to Pereira v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
This was sufficient in itself to distinguish this case from Hall v Wandsworth LBC, Carter v Wandsworth LBC [2004] EWCA Civ 1740; [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
Overall the review did apply the Pereira test in respect of Ms H’s depression. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 1:16 pm
After discovering more about Italy, now Carlos Madureira and David Serras Pereira from the Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores tell us all about the Portuguese system. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
Thus, no doubt because there was no question of Mr Pereira being supported by a family member, Hobhouse LJ used the expression “fend for himself”, which I have discussed above. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
Pereira v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
A Case Comment on Gold Reserve v. [read post]
