Search for: "Perry v. United States of America"
Results 41 - 60
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Since colonial times, anti-miscegenation laws had existed in British North America and, after the Revolutionary War, in the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:19 am
On May 22nd, the United States Supreme Court, in Cooper v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am
United States, Town of Chester v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
He served as Missouri state director for Sen. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
United States, 16-309). [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
Second, in Southern Wine & Spirits of America, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm
" (Samuel Dreher Matlack, Great American Lawyers: The Lives and Influence of and Lawyers Who Have Acquired Permanent National Reputation, and Have Developed the Jurisprudence of the United States: a History of the Legal Profession in America William Lewis ed., Vol. 3, p. 366. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:03 am
Shultz Former Secretary of State General Michael V. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:30 am
Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005) and McCreary County v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Hogan (invalidating same-sex admissions policy), considered her vote in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
The first marriages by same-sex couples were celebrated in the United States in May 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Perry. [read post]
10 May 2015, 12:30 am
"When and how did the United States become a nation? [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, in which it struck down the federal-law provision of DOMA. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
This suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito – all of whom voted to uphold the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm
[iii] Citizens United v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The landscape changed dramatically, however, in 2013, with the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
The Impact of Windsor These recent rulings are fueled by the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
Under [federal immigration regulations], Nabil (and Sawsan, derivatively) would be deportable … if Nabil and Sawsan were actually married when Nabil entered the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
