Search for: "Plaintiff 1 et al v. Wells et al" Results 41 - 60 of 1,693
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The economic harm facing issuers from short attacks and follow-on shareholder litigation is growing and becoming increasingly impactful for other investors as well. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by James Kachmar
Nirvana, LLC, et al., and reversed the dismissal of Mr. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
  OpenAI published a paper in 2020, for example, outlining a scaling analysis for AI models, finding that “language modeling performance improves smoothly and predictably as we appropriately scale up model size, data, and compute”; see Kaplan, McCandlish, et. al, “Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models,” online at:  2001.08361.pdf (arxiv.org). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
A domestic relations order  dated November 1, 2005, similarly provided that the plaintiff would receive a marital share of the defendant’s retirement benefits “at such time as [he] has retired and is actually receiving a regular service retirement allowance. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 7:37 am by ESTHER NEVILLE CASTRO
The 2016 Hoffman v L&M Arts case is a notable example of the delicate balance between personal privacy and the required transparency in the art market. [7] The main focal point of the case is the well-known Mark Rothko painting, called “Red Rothko” formerly owned by Marguerite Hoffman, the plaintiff. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Administrator
  For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Singh et. al. v Braich, 2023 ONSC 5053 [1] This motion is about an examination for discovery gone wrong. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
Note that the petition that the panel just granted was filed by the challengers (Missouri et al.), and argues that the panel erred in finding no First Amendment violation by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the State Department's Global Engagement Center. [* * *] In yesterday's decision in Missouri v. [read post]