Search for: "R B v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY" Results 41 - 60 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm by Ron Coleman
Besides the most famous Model T, Ford also produced the Models A, B, C, F, K, N, R, S, T and Y between the years 1903 and 1938. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:00 pm by Trey Childress
Daimler AG holding that the Kiobel decision barred a class action against Daimler AG, Ford Motor Company, and IBM Corporation for alleged violations of the law of nations in selling cars and computers to the South African government during the Apartheid era. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm by Jessica Mendelson
Ford Motor Co, where the Ninth Circuit held that even when fraud is not a necessary element of a claim, Rule 9(b) applies where a unified course of fraudulent conduct is alleged. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:11 am by Jeff Lipshaw
Ford Motor Company, wherein the shareholders objected because Henry Ford declined to pay a dividend and chose instead to invest profits in a smelting plant so as to reduce the price of the automobiles, not because it putatively related to a commercial purpose, but because of Ford's desire to effect social change - "the betterment of mankind. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:19 pm
Judge Posner suggests this way of teasing the issue out: A worker at Ford Motor Company's River Rouge Complex is an employee of Ford Motor Company. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:14 am by Mi Patente
 BMW – Bayerische Motoren Werke, fábricas bávaras de motores. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:57 am
Ford Motor Co. (2005) 134 Cal App 4th 1363, 37 Cal Rptr 3d 9, and that he has no experience or expertise in the relevant subject matter, Maatuk v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR21), 49 U.S.C. 42121, ordering an award of back pay. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]