Search for: "Ray v. Social Security Administration"
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
(See Melone v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:02 pm
The Salomaa court concluded: The administrator’s procedural violations are similar to those in Saffon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:26 pm
Section 3 provides that an ownership interest or an investment interest:[1] (a) may be through equity, debt or other means; but (b) shall not include ownership of investment securities, including shares or bonds, debentures, notes or other debt instruments, which were purchased on terms generally available to the public and which are in a corporation that is listed for trading on the New York stock exchange or on… [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:32 am
Verdict: wrong. (9) As a result of the jury's guilty verdict in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 3:14 pm
For a disabled adult to be entitled to this “child” benefit, one of his or her parents:• Must be receiving Social Security retirement or disability benefits; or• Must have died and have worked long enough under Social Security.SSI v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on worksharing… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on worksharing… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Related Posts Drawing That Explains Social Networking How to visualize social networking. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:02 am
Law v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:43 am
Department of Health and Human Services and the Federal Trade Commission prompted by 2006 media reports that Dumpsters behind certain CVS pharmacies contained pill bottles with patients' names, Social Security numbers and insurance information. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Plaintiffs Brian Hall, Lewis Randall and Norman Rogers allege that HHS and the Social Security Administration told them they would lose the thousands of dollars they had paid into Social Security over the years if they did not enroll in the federal health care. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 8:30 am
(8) The federal Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear oral argument in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
Moreover, effective January 1, 2010, MIPPA: Increases the level of savings that Medicare Savings Program (“MSP”) applicants may have and still qualify for help with Medicare out-of-pocket costs, excludes the value of life insurance policies from consideration of resources, and requires CMS to translate the MSP application form into the most frequently-used languages; Requires the Commissioner of Social Security to assist MSP and LIS… [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:42 pm
Social Sec Admin Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington SOCIAL SECURITY: ATTORNEY FEES; EAJA KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
