Search for: "Results Advertising, LLC" Results 41 - 60 of 2,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2016, 10:47 am by Sheppard Mullin
Recent efforts by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) to regulate the use of native advertisements — a popular and growing advertising tool– have resulted in the first enforcement action. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 11:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
The post The Ethics of SEO Backlinks for Lawyers: Advertising in the Internet Age appeared first on Khatib Law LLC. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:04 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
When a user enters a keyword that has been purchased by an advertiser, the website of that advertiser will appear as a sponsored link on the search result page. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:16 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
When a user enters a keyword that has been purchased by an advertiser, the website of that advertiser will appear as a sponsored link on the search result page. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 12:33 pm by Rafael Reyneri
A-S Medication Solutions, LLC, a case that could have important implications for fax marketing. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:32 am by Elizabeth A. Patton
Although the facts were unique, which Planting Hope Brands, LLC believed should yield a different result, the NAD relied on the current lack of a registered trademark for RIGHTRICE in making its determination. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 6:14 am by John Hopkins
“The FTC brings this action…to obtain permanent injunctive relief, rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the refund of monies paid, disgorgement of ill-gotten monies, and other equitable relief for the acts or practices of Defendants’ Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc., Quincy Bioscience, LLC, Prevagen, Inc., Quincy Bioscience Manufacturing, LLC, Mark Underwood, and Michael Beaman (collectively, “Defendants”)…in connection… [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 6:14 am by John Hopkins
“The FTC brings this action…to obtain permanent injunctive relief, rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the refund of monies paid, disgorgement of ill-gotten monies, and other equitable relief for the acts or practices of Defendants’ Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc., Quincy Bioscience, LLC, Prevagen, Inc., Quincy Bioscience Manufacturing, LLC, Mark Underwood, and Michael Beaman (collectively, “Defendants”)…in connection… [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:46 am by Lisa Baird
As detailed by Reed Smith attorneys Sulina Gabale and Matthew Kane in a post on our AdLaw by Request blog, the FTC alleges that the companies’ advertised claims of potential weight loss benefits from using GCBE were deceptive and resulted from a flawed research study. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am by Eric Goldman
So, too, are her allegations that Defendants departed from an established advertising pattern, and that search results reflect the departure. [read post]