Search for: "Richard Samp"
Results 41 - 60
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2014, 8:19 pm
But according to Richard Samp, by clarifying the prerequisites for general jurisdiction, the case could if taken seriously revolutionize (for the better!) [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 8:05 pm
” [Richard Samp, WLF] Whistleblower-law lobby tries to get its business model established in West Virginia [W.V. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:54 am
” At Forbes (and cross-posted on the Washington Legal Foundation’s blog The Legal Pulse), Richard Samp discusses another case on the January 10 Conference, Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of Marcia Coyle’s The Roberts Court: The Struggle for the Constitution (Simon & Schuster, May 2013). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:05 pm
Alvarez, the Stolen Valor case [Eugene Volokh] Ruling could benefit commercial speakers in cases like Nike [Richard Samp, WLF] Controversial cartoonist sends many takedown demands to critics who reproduce her work in the course of criticizing it [Rob Beschizza, BoingBoing, Popehat] Interview with Charles Brownstein, who directs the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund [Nick Farr, Abnormal Use] “Even pointing people toward that blog could constitute further defamation. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:13 am
The Obama administration is set to argue to a federal appeals court Friday that the government may breach, with impunity, domestic spying laws adopted in the wake of President Richard M. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:36 pm
“The post-Wal-Mart court rulings so far also illustrate how keen the defense bar is to make the most of the Supreme Court case,” Hurley writes, quoting Richard Samp, a lawyer at the conservative Washington Legal Foundation. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:12 am
Judge Richard Leon of U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
” At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Richard Samp discusses the prospect that the Court could limit lawsuits under the Alien Tort Statute through its decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
" Richard Samp has this post today at "The Legal Pulse" blog of the Washington Legal Foundation. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:49 am
Richard Samp – One particularly important important aspect of the Wal-Mart decision was its holding that Rule 23 entitles a class-action defendant to “individualized determinations” regarding individualized issues of fact. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:20 pm
Richard Samp may well be correct to argue that, in light of its recent decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:22 pm
To discuss the case, we have Richard A. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:18 am
” Meanwhile, Richard Samp, an attorney for Wal-Mart, said the Court’s ruling had nothing to do with employment discrimination and everything to do with maintaining fairness for both sides in nationwide class actions. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:18 am
Yesterday, Richard Samp and Lauren Gilbert responded to last week’s posts. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
” This law, as Kevin Johnson and Richard Samp have already discussed, contained some of the harshest provisions to date regulating immigrants. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:28 am
United States by Richard Samp, Chief Counsel of the Washington Legal Foundation. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
Our contributors include: Roderick Hills, New York University Carissa Hessick, Arizona State University Kevin Johnson, University California, Davis Larry Joseph, Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund Hope Lewis, Northeastern University Richard Samp, Washington Legal Foundation Ilya Shapiro, Cato Institute Rogers Smith, University of Pennsylvania Peter Spiro, Temple University Margret Stock, University of Alaska, Anchorage & Lane Powell PC Carol Swain, Vanderbilt… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:00 am
Keisler, Sidley Austin LLP Patricia Ann Millett, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Richard A. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:20 pm
Supreme Court disbars Bill Lerach [Richard Samp, WLF] And check out the byline of the former class-action king’s recent contribution to The Nation; do you think it omits anything material? [read post]
