Search for: "Riverkeeper, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2010, 2:53 pm
Estrin Supervising Attorney, Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic, Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Riverkeeper, Inc. 34 Harv. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:54 am
” The Notices were served on behalf of Appalachian Voices, Inc., Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc., Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Inc., Kentucky Riverkeeper, Inc., and several citizens who reside in Eastern Kentucky. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
Johns Riverkeeper and the Public Trust Environmental Law Institute of Florida sued JEA in 2007 over more than 200 instances of sewer overflows since 2001. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 8:28 am
Riverkeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
EPA alleges that Oxarc, Inc. failed to update their Risk Management Program at least every five years. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here Cummins Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm
Click Here Lionel Harris Oil Company, Inc. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 8:16 am
Riverkeeper, Inc. and Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
— Toledo Blade, November 26, 2009 Sunoco Inc. has agreed to pay a $32,250 civil fine to the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency for deficiencies found at its Toledo Refinery during inspections in April, 2008. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with Sunoco Inc. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:44 am
RIVERKEEPER, INC. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 3:30 pm
Riverkeeper, Inc., I noted that the end result was that the Court has now accorded broad deference to EPA to determine when and where the agency will employ the use of a cost-benefit analysis. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 6:32 am
New Jersey was one of six states that joined in the Entergy case -- in support of Riverkeeper. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:09 am
Riverkeeper, Inc., the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of cost-benefit analysis in environmental regulation. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
Relying on the Second Circuit’s earlier decision in Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 2:48 pm
The Town Board, as the lead agency, "may require a supplemental EIS, limited to the specific significant adverse environmental impacts not addressed or inadequately addressed in the EIS that arise from: (a) changes proposed for the project; or (b) newly discovered information; or (c) a change in circumstances related to the project" (6 NYCRR 617.9 [a] [7] [i]; Matter of Riverkeeper, Inc. v Planning Bd. of Town of Southeast, 9 NY3d at 231). [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 2:48 pm
The Town Board, as the lead agency, "may require a supplemental EIS, limited to the specific significant adverse environmental impacts not addressed or inadequately addressed in the EIS that arise from: (a) changes proposed for the project; or (b) newly discovered information; or (c) a change in circumstances related to the project" (6 NYCRR 617.9 [a] [7] [i]; Matter of Riverkeeper, Inc. v Planning Bd. of Town of Southeast, 9 NY3d at 231). [read post]
