Search for: "Rubin v. USA"
Results 41 - 60
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Tweets are my own. (51) @VLJeker – V. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:42 am
City of Miami and Bank of America Corp. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm
” The Associated Press reports that “authorities were able to obtain roughly two years' worth of calling records directly from the phone companies of the married couple” under the new USA Freedom Act after the NSA’s collection of bulk metadata under Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act came to an end on November 29. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
The case is Dunn et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 4:19 pm
**Jessica Alba’s Honest Company the Latest Target in California of the All Natural Plaintiff Class Action Bar in cocamidopropyl betaine case ** . . . [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 7:27 pm
DePyper v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm
All the contributors are important contracts scholars in their own right: David Campbell and John Wightman from the UK, Brian Bix, Jay Feinman, Robert Gordon, Claire Hill, Charles Knapp, Ethan Leib, Deborah Post, Edward Rubin, Carol Sanger, Robert Scott, Gordon Smith, Josh Whitford (with Li-Wen Lin) and William Woodward from the USA. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:45 am
Reaction from ATP, Cato, Huffpost, Jennifer Rubin, and Justice at Stake, in addition to the posts below from Rick Hasen and Rick Pildes. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:04 am
K 100 L433 2012 Legal education in the digital age / edited by Edward Rubin. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Monday’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am
Hobbs and Miller v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
DOHERTY Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, c2011 KF1530.F54 L67 2011 See Catalog Banks and banking, International ICC UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS Paris: ICC Services Pub. ; New York, NY: ICC Books USA, c2006 K1060.8 .I54 2006 See Catalog Bar examinations -- United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
DOHERTY Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, c2011 KF1530.F54 L67 2011 See Catalog Banks and banking, International ICC UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS Paris: ICC Services Pub. ; New York, NY: ICC Books USA, c2006 K1060.8 .I54 2006 See Catalog Bar examinations -- United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:28 pm
Briefly: Yesterday in Camreta v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:08 pm
Joan Hennessy writes about cover subject Paul Mark Sandler of Shapiro Sher Guinot & Sandler, a top 10 lawyer who has tried many high-profile cases (including USA v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:32 pm
DAIOHS USA, Inc., et al., 181 Cal. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:31 am
USA Today (10/22, Rubin) reports that about "one in four recently approved products in a relatively new class of medicines needed some type of regulatory action because of safety issues that arose after they came on the market," according to a study published in the Oct. 22/29 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
In finding its application of Kravis proper, the Board found that the Respondent could not have relied on the due process standard overruled by Kravis as well settled when it withdrew recognition of the union, because the Supreme Court's earlier decision in NLRB v. [read post]
