Search for: "Scott Schmidt"
Results 41 - 60
of 339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer and Daniel E. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:32 am
Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer and Daniel E. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 8:34 am
However, the Court further held that an alteration which can render the form ambiguous or confusing will serve to make the form void.The Majority Opinion written by Justice Baer can be read at this LINK.The Dissenting Opinion by Justice Donohue can be read HERE I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 8:37 am
Here is a link to the Supreme Court Order:http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Supreme/out/845MAL2012.pdf I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law office of Schmidt Kramer and Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic office of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for publicizing this decision. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
., of the Harrisburg law firm of Schmidt Kramer. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:07 pm
Click HERE to view that Order.Click HERE to view the Tort Talk post on the Superior Court's original decision and to access a Link to that decision.Updates to follow as this issue continues its way along the appellate ladder.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this Order to my attention. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
Cooper of the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania law firm of Schmidt Kramer, P.C. for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
.), Judge Bradford Charles ruled in response to a defense discovery motion for a protective order that, during a neuropsychological IME, the Plaintiff's attorney would be allowed to be present during the preliminary interview phase by the doctor of the Plaintiff.However, the court also ruled that once the standardized testing portion of the neuropsych IME began, no one other than the doctor and the Plaintiff would be allowed in the room and no recording device would be permitted in the… [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Schmidt Kramer firm in Harrisburg, PA for bringing this Order to my attention. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer and Daniel E. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer and Daniel E. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
Please click this LINK to view this decision online.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper, Esquire of the Harrisburg, PA office of Schmidt Kramer for bring this case to my attention. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
The Concurring Opinion by Justice Wecht can be viewed HERE.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 7:30 pm
The additional argument by the insurance company that the exclusion is valid when an insured rejected stacking was not accepted by the Court.In this decision, the Eastern District Federal Court held that Gallagher applies in all household exclusion cases.The Court also noted that the focus on the rejection of stacking question is not based upon actions of the insured, but instead based upon the policy under which coverage is sought.The Court in Stockdale also ruled that the… [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
WCAB (Bushta), 183 A.3d 958 (Pa. 2018)(Bushta II).According to the Opinion, this matter arose out of a work-related car accident when the Plaintiff's police cruiser was struck by another vehicle.Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this decision to my attention. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
C-0048-CV-2015-10186.The court awarded the Plaintiff costs and attorney's fees after Plaintiff was forced to file a Petition to Enforce a Settlement that was held up by the Defendant's refusal to accept the Plaintiff's proposed Final Settlement Detail Document designed to provide notice to Medicare of the Settlement.In a detailed Order without Opinion, the Court ordered that the settlement go forth and awarded the Plaintiff costs and attorney's fees caused by the need to file the… [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:14 am
I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg, PA law firm of Schmidt Kramer and Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic, PA law office of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for advising me of this new decision. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:29 pm
Mannion in Scott v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:46 am
An article appeared in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette, and here is the Answer from Schmidt Kramer's own Scott Cooper, who is serving as the President of the Pennsylvania Association for Justice (Pa. [read post]
