Search for: "State of Connecticut, ex rel" Results 41 - 60 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
It is not clear whether any of this would have come to light were it not for the actions of a relatively junior CIA employee, who is now the target of almost daily attacks by Trump and efforts to make his identity public. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But the relatively poor turnout through the years argues for a different approach. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
FEC records show Red State Data and Digital, which was founded by Candice? [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The clauses restrict the ability of federal official to accept benefits, or “emoluments,” from foreign or state governments. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:08 am by Jeff Welty
S565 would set a relatively high bar for the issuance of an ex parte order. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am by Tinker Ready
Prosecutors charged an ex-convict with robbing a string of banks across South Florida over two years. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Connecticut, “Of that freedom one may say that it is the matrix, the indispensable condition, of nearly every other form of freedom. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:05 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Submit portions of bills the car insurance does not pay to your major medical carrier (ex- Blue Cross, Connecticut General). [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:00 am
” The precedent was the People ex rel. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:07 am by Jim Sedor
Michigan, a medical-marijuana state, passed a 2016 law banning even relatives of its pot oversight board members from having any financial stake in the marijuana industry. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Schachtman
In a 1996 class action, a district court held that the immunity barred a class action filed by relatives of gunshot victims against gun manufacturers. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Summaries of government, administrative and related law decisions posted by Justia People ex rel. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 7:23 am by Lorene Park
That evidence showed that the employees were “terminated because of their insubordination, not protected activity,” the appeals court declared, rejecting their retaliation claims under the False Claims Act (U.S. ex rel. [read post]