Search for: "THRESHOLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC." Results 41 - 60 of 641
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
A short-form Schedule 13G may be filed by so-called “passive investors”[3] within 10 calendar days of exceeding the 5% threshold and then updated: for any increase in beneficial ownership in excess of 10% and thereafter any increase or decrease by more than 5%; to a Schedule 13D when exceeding the 20% threshold; and for all changes within 45 days after year-end. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 11:05 am by Dennis Crouch
Zap Surgical Systems, Inc., — F.4th — (Fed. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 2:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Click-to-Call Technologies LP, No. 22-873, focusing on the scope of IPR estoppel under 35 USC 315(e). [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 2:02 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Solutions Law Press, Inc. invites you to receive future updates by registering on our Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 1:58 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  The settlement resulted from OCR’s investigation of a September 9, 2015 breach report that cyber-attackers gained unauthorized access to its information technology systems. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
Atreya Mathur In an ongoing legal dispute between Yuga Labs, the creator of the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFT collection, and the artist Ripps, on April 21, 2023, Central District Court of California has issued a ruling in favor of Yuga’s motion for summary judgment, addressing various legal facets within the context of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 1:20 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The EEOC sued Digital Arbitrage, Inc., doing business as Cloudbeds (“Cloudbeds”) an international, remote-first technology company, in U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
Services will be categorised as either Category 1, 2A or 2B if they meet certain thresholds set out in secondary legislation, with higher risk categories having additional obligations (e.g. producing transparency reports). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Abitron garnered far less attention than did other intellectual property (IP) cases argued this term, including Jack Daniels Products, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 11:41 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Kristina sees two significant changes on the horizon: Determining how to properly and effectively employ AI and technology to increase efficiency and reduce costs; and Continued access to data enabling both in-house and outside counsel to make smarter, data-driven decisions. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Search engines The ICO has, since Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12) (‘Google Spain’) considered claims from data subjects about the lawfulness of the processing of their personal data by search engines. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
Others, however, argue that compensation claims under UK GDPR/GDPR are not subject to any such threshold. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: The test of whether an entity is carrying on business in Australia is an important threshold for the application of many Australian laws. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:43 am by Eric Goldman
During oral arguments at the Supreme Court on March 22, 2023 in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]