Search for: "The AutoZone" Results 41 - 60 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2021, 8:04 am by Friedman & Houlding LLP
 Autozone’s failure to take action when it knew of the sexual harassment resulted in the highest sexual harassment verdict in North and South Carolina in 2018. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:46 am by Theo Francis
Either way, AutoZone directors are likely to see it as the main course. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 6:45 am by Jonathan Assia
AutoZone Stores, Inc. and Autozoners, LLC, Plaintiff Michael Brady brought a class action suit against AutoZone Stores, Inc. and Autozoners LLC for allegedly failing to provide its nonexempt employees with meal breaks in accordance with Washington state law. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:12 pm
He brought a claim against AutoZone for false imprisonment, claiming that he was wrongly accused of stealing money, questioned for three hours, and then coerced into signing a false confession. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 6:43 pm
  In the Absher case, plaintiff Dave Absher (who, when returning merchandise purchased from Autozone, was required to put his name and telephone number on a voucher in order to process the refund), claimed that Autozone’s practices violated the Act. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 5:32 am
Auto parts retailer AutoZone agreed to pay $150,000 to settle a sexual harassment and retaliation lawsuit filed by the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:58 pm by admin
Shepherd, a former parts sales manager, worked at AutoZone from 1999 until 2004 when AutoZone placed him on involuntary medical leave before terminating him. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 6:42 am by Nasir Pasha & Matt Staub
Nasir and Matt discuss the pregnancy discrimination case against AutoZone that resulted in a $185 million verdict. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 11:12 am
On May 10, 2013, plaintiff Anthony Wilson, 44, slipped and fell on an oil patch outside an AutoZone store in Bristol. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:25 am by Dan Bressler
“Worker Fights AutoZone’s Bid To DQ Atty In Bias Suit” — “A former AutoZone employee suing the company for discrimination has told a Pennsylvania federal judge that his lawyer’s reference to a previous confidential settlement, which the auto parts retailer claims is grounds for disqualification, was necessary to prove the company was retaliating against him for protected activity. [read post]