Search for: "The Pool Company, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 1,135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by ilyabeylin
Last Thursday’s split summary-judgment decision in the case that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought against Ripple Labs, Inc. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
For example, in March 2021, a shareholder challenged the truth of representations made by Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. in its proxy statements about its policy to instruct any search firm it engages to include candidates of diverse backgrounds in the pool from which the company selects director nominees. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 11:41 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Many companies are leveraging international firms for regulatory, litigation, IP, and other legal needs outside the U.S. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm by Florian Mueller
While the European Commission doesn't seem to appreciate the contribution of patent pools to the licensing process the way it used to do, Avanci's success has made it part of the solution. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Fundamental Law for Journalists Author: Mark Bourrie Publisher: Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
9 May 2023, 10:49 am by Whittel & Melton, LLC
In May 2022, Metric Engineering Inc., an engineering consulting company, conducted a safety analysis for the intersection in order to obtain crash data for the previous eight years and make field observations of the crossing. [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
On April 24, 2023, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:20 pm by Marcia Delgadillo
Kraken’s model depended on pooling the assets transferred by investors and staking them on behalf of those investors. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Safelite Fulfillment, Inc. d/b/a Safelite AutoGlass, Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-00887-LY, in U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Recognizing the widespread harm this would cause, on February 20, 2023, searching for a way to reconcile belated challenges to the very reverse merger by which hundreds of SPAC targets were taken public and where such companies had long since been operating as public companies, the Chancery Court held that affected companies could retroactively validate these “pooled” stockholder votes under Section 205 of the DGCL. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Recognizing the widespread harm this would cause, on February 20, 2023, searching for a way to reconcile belated challenges to the very reverse merger by which hundreds of SPAC targets were taken public and where such companies had long since been operating as public companies, the Chancery Court held that affected companies could retroactively validate these “pooled” stockholder votes under Section 205 of the DGCL. [read post]