Search for: "Thomas D Powers"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Indeed, Post himself confessed that when he was assigned volume on Taft in the Holmes Devise series, he felt he’d “drawn the short straw. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
This was the point of Justice Thomas’ very first question to Jason Murray, and it was a recurring theme throughout the argument. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Moreover, even if Colorado’s intent were to try to impose a condition on Trump’s service, obviously that condition would be that he not be Section-3-disqualified to serve on January 20, 2025, rather than that (as Mitchell would have it) that he’d be disqualified from taking office as of March 5, 2024 (the date of the Colorado primary). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:24 am
Finally, the Senate addressed pre-trial motions to dismiss in the cases of Judge Alcee Hastings and Judge Thomas Porteous. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
In 2014, they rose up to protest President Blaise Compaoré’s attempt to eliminate presidential term limits after he’d already held power for three decades. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
But without some limiting principles—and Carr and Simington did not identify any—the “nondiscrimination” label could hand state governments a power to regulate social media that is nearly as “unbridled” as the power NetChoice would claim for Big Tech under the label of “editorial discretion. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Once again, Justice Thomas began the questioning. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Thomas in St. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Thomas any better? [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the state’s power to do so because that candidate could not serve in the office during the term for which the election was being held (see art. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the state’s power to do so because that candidate could not serve in the office during the term for which the election was being held (see art. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am
Murphy’s book A Guide to Judicial and Political Review of Federal Agencies is briefly summarized in the following article: Thomas E. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
Thomas G. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
[Justice Scalia erred because there are no “Officers of the United States” appointed outside Article II, Section II.] [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
§ 1, cl. 1, likewise vests the executive Power in “the President of the United States of America. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
” Accordingly, the Anderson plaintiffs have not obtained the relief they were seeking for the primary election, and it's not clear that they'd be able to do so, even if the Supreme Court were to rule in their favor. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[Their amicus brief endorses the view that members of state legislatures are officers. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
Circuit accorded deference to the rule, even though the NFA is a criminal statute which does not delegate power to ATF to expand. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:17 pm
Then we’d walk (usually a long way) to Fenway Park. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 7:28 pm
Thomas W. [read post]
