Search for: "U.S. Imaging, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 2,655
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 2:06 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Rogers, Jr. issued Order No. 25 in Certain Printing and Imaging Devices and Component Thereof (Inv. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:55 am by Eric Schweibenz
  In the Orders, ALJ Luckern denied Respondents Research In Motion, Ltd., Research In Motion Corporation, Nokia Corp., Nokia Inc., HTC America, Inc., LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 3:39 pm
  On July 24, 2009, ALJ Gildea  issued his  ID finding that a violation of Section 337 occurred in the importation into the U.S., the sale for importation, or the sale within the U.S. after importation of certain laser imageable lithographic printing plates by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 10, and 27 of U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 8:33 am
The complaint alleges that Oki Data Corporation of Japan and Oki Data Americas, Inc. of Mount Laurel, New Jersey (collectively, "Oki Data") unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and sell within the U.S. after importation certain printing and imaging devices, including multifunction printers ("MFP"), and components thereof, including at least image drums and fuser units, which allegedly infringe U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 11:40 am by Rubric Legal LLC
Under U.S. copyright law, original creative works are copyrighted and protected from reproduction, distribution, performance, public display, or derivate use without the express permission of the creator. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
The appeal was brought by LG Electronics, Inc, against ImmerVision, Inc. and related to claims of U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
The appeal was brought by LG Electronics, Inc, against ImmerVision, Inc. and related to claims of U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 2:27 pm by Peter Reap
Peter ReapIn a challenge to Facebook’s patent application for a method for arranging images contiguously in an array, a prior art reference—a patent application filed by Perrodin that related to placing images on a grid and did not require contiguity in response to resizing or rearranging in all cases—could not have disclosed the limitation of Facebook’s application that required all of the image elements to be contiguous, the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:47 am by Eric Schweibenz
  In its May 13, 2010 complaint and June 16, 2010 amended complaint, Flashpoint alleges a violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain electronic imaging devices that infringe U.S. [read post]