Search for: "UNITED STATES et al v. WESTERN DISTRICT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al" Results 41 - 48 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces… [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am by Richard Hunt
The defendants almost immediately agreed to waive their claims, presumably because they did not want to litigate without the home field advantage they command in the Western District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:30 am by J. Gordon Hylton
  In the fall of 1942, he signed a professional contract with the Lockport White Sox of the Class D Pennsylvania, Ontario, and New York League, more commonly known as the PONY League. [read post]