Search for: "UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 1-30"
Results 41 - 60
of 291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2011, 2:02 pm
The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to the class. 1. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:33 pm
If plea negotiations are ongoing, the parties may review the status of the plea offer. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 8:49 am
A New NAFTA First was the signing of a new North American free trade agreement on Nov. 30. [read post]
26 May 2012, 1:44 pm
(a)1. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:04 pm
Does 1-59, for example, hackers unlawfully accessed copyrighted materials on a company’s protected website.[5] The company brought suit against the unknown culprits — named “John Does” in the complaint — for violating the CFAA, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Copyright Act.[6] It then provided the court with the internet protocol addresses of each defendant.[7] The court granted the company’s motion… [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
On February 1, 2005, the parties entered into an oral stipulation of settlement in open court, which provided, inter alia, that the defendant was presently receiving disability benefits under his pension plan, but that “there will come a time that he will be entitled to retirement benefits, and, at that time, which will be at age sixty two, he will divide the marital share of the pension with his wife equally. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
" The Interim Ruling summarized the dispute as encompassing two issues: (1) "who has jurisdiction to decide particular substantive issues" and (2) "the substantive issues, namely whether the affirmative defens [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 12:50 pm
Update 1/30/2018: We received a report of another scam. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
Six Unknown Fed. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
” This appeal by Anderson Strathern LLP and the particular solicitor concerned against certain decisions of the Commission dated 30 January 2015 has now raised the same question as a live issue and the court therefore requires to reach a concluded view. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
’ 1 U.S.Code § 1. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 12:05 pm
The delete finger should feel heavy now… Are you addressed by name? [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 12:49 pm
July 1, 2014). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
Lastly, the law reduces the prior 45-day notification timeline to 30-days. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:53 am
Following his recent decision in Gray v UVW ([2010] EWHC 2367 (QB)), he again decided that, despite the parties having agreed a consent order including anonymity, the interests of the public required that the claimant be named. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 4:37 am
A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 213 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) A man may register no later than thirty (30) working days after the birth of the child by completing and submitting a registration form as prescribed by the cabinet. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
In a notification of loss of rights under Rule 112(1) EPC of 30 June 2015 the Receiving Section informed the applicant that the filing date did not lie within the twelve-month priority period and that the application did therefore not enjoy a right of priority with respect to the oldest priority claimed in the application. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 12:31 pm
Update 1/30/2018: We received a report of another scam. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 5:16 am
(a) No party, or attorney of a party, or person interested in an action, or related to any judge of the court by consanguinity or affinity within the third degree, can be appointed receiver therein without the written consent of the parties, filed with the clerk. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 7:49 am
Update 3/30/2021: We received a report of another scam. [read post]
