Search for: "United States ex rel. John Doe"
Results 41 - 60
of 286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Mar. 3, 2014); Doe ex rel. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:00 pm
Hearron: I think Ex Parte Young does support in federal court, yes, in -- in part because state court review in circumstances like in Young and here is inadequate for a number of reasons that I'm happy to get into.I think that Mr. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:25 am
John Does 1-3 v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
Perhaps, then, Kwass should no longer be relied on, given its stress on the distinction between law and equity, see, e.g., 81 S.E.2d at 243-46—a distinction abolished in West Virginia in 1960, State ex rel. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
End Citizens United had alleged Scott and the New Republican PAC, a group he formerly chaired, violated election laws prohibiting coordination between candidates and outside groups. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The notes could be turned over to Congress in a matter of days if Trump does not file papers in court seeking to block such a handover. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
Of course Notre Dame would not hire someone who was involved in a lawsuit against the bishop, it thought.Bev does remember that Bishop John D’Arcy had to pay $400 to her for lying under oath. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
If I were to include a single additional case from a court, I would include one from a federal trial court rather than the Supreme Court: future Justice William Woods’s United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Drops John Bolton Book Lawsuit, Won’t Charge the Ex-Security Aide Who Became Trump’s Scathing Critic MSN – Spencer Hsu and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 6/16/2021 The Justice Department abandoned its effort to claw back profits of a book by former Trump national security adviser John Bolton and closed a grand jury investigation into whether he criminally mishandled classified information without charging him. [read post]
6 May 2021, 12:23 pm
§ 2383 provides: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 1:48 pm
However, with United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
David Cameron to Be Investigated by Lobbying Body BBC – Staff | Published: 3/24/2021 Former United Kingdom Prime Minister David Cameron is being investigated by a lobbying watchdog after reports he contacted government officials on behalf of financial services company Greensill Capital. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
But it does not plan to divulge the names of attendees of virtual meetings, which are the primary mode of interaction until the pandemic eases. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 12:04 pm
If a patent prize or reward system requires the government to be sensible in allocating an appropriate amount of money ex ante, the fact that the United States invested too little money does not inspire great confidence. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 7:05 am
In United States ex. rel. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
There is a rather fey textual argument I have heard that runs like this: Of course you can disqualify someone who is not a civil officer of the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
While tort principles have long been bedrock tenets of American jurisprudence, constitutional tort law is a relatively recent phenomenon. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Bookstores, g., United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:55 am
That does not, however, mean that the state faces no fiscal constraints. [read post]
