Search for: "United States v. Davis"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
Finally, as the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
“Maybe put most boldly, I think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Guerra v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
United States: the states are disabled from legislating in this area of federal interest. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Justice Gorsuch was the most interested questioner on whether the President was an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
This Note explores the evolution of the law on slavery and race in the United States prior to the Civil War, focusing on Maine and the political pressures surrounding the SJC at that time. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Jefferson Davis: President of the United States? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
Davis v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
The reason, quite simply, is that these transactions did not result in a liquidation, in whole or in part, of the camp business”]; and Dukas v Davis Aircraft Prods. [read post]
