Search for: "United States v. Pam" Results 41 - 60 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Don Cruse
Rogelio Casados and Rafaela Casados, No. 10-0523 In re United Scaffolding, Inc., No. 10-0526 Rusk State Hospital v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:11 am by Ronald Mann
The amicus brief filed by the United States, by contrast, addresses the problem more directly. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:59 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
FCBA will seek CLE credit for curriculum meeting CLE certification requirements from applicable states for paying registrants and FCBA members from within the United States (except OH, PA, IN, SC, & PR). [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Pam Karlan also hones in that piece from long ago, as does Joey Fishkin. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 10:25 am by Guest Blogger
Governor of Florida (also known as “Docs v Glocks”). [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 Individuals with law degrees occupy roughly half the state governorships, more than half the seats in the United States Senate, and more than a third of the seats in the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If one compares the United States Constitution with the fifty state constitutions, let alone most modern foreign constitutions, it is easily the least democratic constitution in the mix. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
The Maine Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
House Resolution 676 was framed very broadly: The lawsuit could “seek any appropriate relief regarding the failure” of all executive-branch officials — including the president himself — “to act in a manner consistent with that official’s duties under the Constitution and laws of the United States with respect to implementation” of the ACA. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Bonauto of Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders takes to the lectern, she barely makes it into her third sentence before Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asks her about the language in United States v. [read post]